Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can you say PAGE A1 -- Boston Globe?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 03:13 PM
Original message
Can you say PAGE A1 -- Boston Globe?
i just KNEW you could :)

<snip>

Bush unbowed on Iraq

Queries follow admission of false evidence

By John Donnelly, Globe Staff, 7/10/2003

RETORIA, South Africa -- President Bush yesterday declined to answer questions on whether he misled Americans by stating in January that Iraq attempted to buy uranium from the African nation of Niger, a now-discredited claim that bolstered his case for going to war. Instead, Bush said the world was safer because of his decision to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

Bush made his first substantive comments on the uranium issue a few hours after the clearest acknowledgement yet by his spokesman that the president's original accusation in his State of the Union speech was inaccurate. The issue has resurfaced noisily since the White House announced Monday night that the initial allegation of an Iraqi attempt to buy uranium from Niger was based on documents later found to have been falsified.

The controversy has taken on greater weight because of suggestions by some critics that the Bush administration exaggerated the dimensions of Hussein's purported weapons of mass destruction program. The United States has yet to find any evidence in Iraq to back up additional charges that Hussein had extensive chemical and biological weapons programs, but White House and Pentagon officials steadfastly say they will find such evidence.

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/191/nation/Bush_unbowed_on_Iraq+.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Boston Globe does not redeem itself with this article.
IMHO.

They gloss over details of everything negative. Poor article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i agree but not the point
in the last 3 days, this story has moved (in this market anyway) from the "B" section, to the A10 area of the paper to page A1 TODAY.

THAT IMHO is more proof that THIS might be (finally) the one that brings this cabal down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No cigars just yet
...We need to see the passive voice replaced before we can really celebrate. As soon as it moves from "mistakes were made", we can begin to let up. But not before!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yer right, as usual.
But if they just put out pap instead of real meat, does it really help to have it on page 1?

Well, maybe, for a few who will take the time and make the effort to FIND OUT because they wonder or are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justicebuilder Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nice Dubyaism
Not quite a tautology, but certainly an empty and meaningless statement:

''And there's no doubt in my mind, when it's all said and done, the facts will show the world the truth.''

Um, yeah. Ok. The facts will show the world the truth. So right now, the facts are showing the world, what? Reruns of Bosom Buddies?

jb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. lol! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now WE have to find the weapons!!!!!
That's what Ari said:

"Fleischer said that not only would the United States find chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, but that 'I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are.'"

This is getting more hysterical by the minute. I may have to start watching Ari's press conferences again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Now...how do they
plant weapons that are traceable to France or Germany?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. No...we have to find the weapons
that WE already said weren't there!

'I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are.'"

Is Ari on drugs???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. Seeking "the" Bush photo
I understand someone snapped a very unflattering photo of Bush just before he started to lose his temper on the podium. Does anyone have a link to the image?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. let us know when they endorse Kerry
as the only man who can save us from the destruction wrought by Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC