Gore1FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-03 03:55 AM
Original message |
9/11 EPA report -- what is worse? |
|
This may have been discussed before, but I did not see it if ti did.
Is it worse that they lied about the health hazards, or is it worse, knowing that there really were health hazrds at ground zero, they built a platform to draw tourists?
It seems bad enough to lie and endanger the worker's and residents health. To pro-actively generate tourism to a known health hazard seems even more outrageous.
thoughts?
|
Systematic Chaos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-03 05:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
back in the fifties, people would have picnics on distant hillsides out in the desert and watch above-ground nuclear tests.
Better to let people get fried one chromosome at a time than to come clean and admit that the whole nuclear program was so deadly. I used to have a friend whose family would watch the tests. I guess that explains why his parents were total freaks....
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |