Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SHAME > George Bush FAILED to Get Bin Laden "Dead or Alive"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:36 AM
Original message
SHAME > George Bush FAILED to Get Bin Laden "Dead or Alive"
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 11:17 AM by Stephanie


The ONLY thing Bush really had to accomplish in his term of office is to capture the man who bombed our Twin Towers with airplanes. Yet here we are almost four years later and bin Laden is still out there taunting us with threats.

What a complete and utter failure George Bush is. I don't know how he holds his head up in public. SHAME on you George Bush. What's your excuse this time?

Why does Bush get a free pass on this, of all things? And when can we have a REAL president again?


____________________________


12/14/2001
Bush pledges to get bin Laden, dead or alive


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush pledged anew Friday that Osama bin Laden will be taken "dead or alive," no matter how long it takes, amid indications that the suspected terrorist may be bottled up in a rugged Afghan canyon. The president, in an Oval Office meeting with Thailand's prime minister, would not predict the timing of bin Laden's capture but said he doesn't care how the suspect is brought to justice. "I don't care, dead or alive — either way," Bush said. "It doesn't matter to me."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2001/12/14/bush-binladen.htm

____________________________


3/1/2005
Bin Laden Enlisting Al-Zarqawi for Attacks


WASHINGTON - Osama bin Laden is enlisting his top operative in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, to plan potential attacks on the United States, U.S. intelligence indicates.

Al-Zarqawi, who rivals bin Laden as the nation's public enemy No. 1, has been involved in attacks in the Middle East but has not been known before to have set his sights on the United States.

The Homeland Security Department issued a classified bulletin to officials over the weekend about the intelligence, which spokesman Brian Roehrkasse described Monday as "credible but not specific."

The intelligence was obtained over the past several weeks, officials said.

The United States has no immediate plans to raise its national terror alert level, Roehrkasse said. However, the intelligence "reiterates the desire by al-Qaida and its associates to target the homeland," he said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=1&u=/ap/20050301/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/terror_threat

____________________________






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whenever anyone asks me
why New York went so heavily for Kerry, I tell them this is the reason. As opposed to the schmucks who say NY has forgotten 9/11, I say we seem to be the only ones who really remember it AND who was responsible (and yes, I do believe it was Bin Laden - whether he was working with the BFEE is something else).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree - it's like it happened yesterday here
And it's shocking to see bin Laden back in the news as if that's normal. 52 warnings! And nothing was done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. * says He's Hiding".....................remember......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Yeah...but didn't Bush say that "we were going to smoke him out "
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 08:02 PM by DemGirl7
LOL...Gotta love the Cowboy tough talk...that is some funny stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. SUH-PRAHZ! SUH-PRAHZ! SUH-PRAHZ!
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 11:08 AM by BrklynLiberal
Just add this to the long list of ways that the dimwit has screwed the country. He has continued to do such a wonderful job of securing the country and protecting us from "terraists"

Let me take this opportunity to thank all the maroons who voted for him.



I am sure all the dead and wounded American soldiers and their families are grateful, as well as those of the dead and wounded Iraqis.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Also the dead and wounded New Yorkers
very grateful, and proud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes. I apologize for not including the NYers, being one myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. $hrub needs these guys free and out-there. We all know that, don't we.


BE THE BU$H OPPOSITION;24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. True. Just as they need the chaos in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. And how many opportunities did dimwit pass up to get Al-Zarqawi?
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 11:20 AM by BrklynLiberal
Nominated for greatest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't know - what is the history of Al-Zarqawi?
I don't know much about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Supposedly Bush has three opportunities to get him before the invasion
of Iraq, but considered the invasion of Iraq a higher priority. I am looking for sources right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Here is some of Al-Zarqawi's story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Wow! So al Zarqawi and bin Laden opposed each other?

From your link:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?id=1521846767-884

During the trial of suspected terrorist Shadi Abdallah, it is learned that Abu Mussab Al Zarqawi, a Jordanian Muslim militant accused by the Bush administration of having ties to Osama bin Laden, is actually the founder of another Islamist group, al-Tawhid, which works “in opposition” to al-Qaeda (see Mid-1990s). The aim of the group is to kill Jews and install an Islamic regime in Jordan. Abdallah recounts one instance where Zarqawi vetoed a proposal to share charity funds collected in Germany with al-Qaeda. According to Abdallah, Al Zarqawi's organization had also “competed” with al-Qaeda for new recruits. Details of the trial are passed on to US intelligence. Nonetheless, Bush will claim in a televised speech on October 7, 2002 (see October 7, 2002) that a “very senior al-Qaeda leader ... received medical treatment in Baghdad this year,” a reference to Al Zarqawi. And Colin Powell will similarly state on February 5, 2003 (see 10:30 a.m. February 5, 2003) that “Iraq is harboring the network of Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, an associate and collaborator of Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda lieutenants.” Both statements are made even though “US intelligence already had concluded that Zarqawi was not an al-Qaeda member ....”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. We can probably thank Dim Son for pushing them into each other's arms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. If he gets Bin Laden then what will he have to frighten us with?
There will be no truly scary name to attach to CIA bulletins and "chatter" about the next attack on US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's what I was going to say.
There is no "failure" to capture bin Laden. Bush needs him out there so he can be used as a bogeyman to scare the sheeple.

My disgust for this putrid "man" is growing to almost unmanageable proportions. What a horrible, horrible president he is. Imagine! Our president attacks us every single day. Even OBL couldn't manage that.

Impeachment is way, WAY too good for this POS. I think "extraordinary rendition" is called for. Can I help? Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let's not forget that the Anthrax Terrorist(s) is/are still at large
When's the last time ChimpCo mentioned that little piece of history??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The 2nd largest terrorist attack on USA soil!
America's capital was attacked with WMD (bioweapons) shortly after 9-11, and nobody (almost) remembers.

During the campaign 2004, the republicans stated that gwbush* was successful because the USA hadn't been hit again. I like to remind them about the Anthrax attack. So many don't remember.

The 2nd largest terrorist attack on US soil also happened on bush*s watch, and the terrorists are still free!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. George Bush failed. nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Well yes. But this one is outrageous.
Bush swaggers around with socks in his flight suit pretending he's winning the war on terror. Meanwhile the one thing we all, pacifists and war supporters alike, can agree on is that bin Laden is a murderer who must be captured or killed. And that is the one thing George Bush has not done. And he should resign in shame because of it. I can't believe I'm still hearing threats from bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. Osama who? Saddam was the real mastermind!
OBL is just a virtual computer generated image made by Saddam Hussien and his sons by linking up a bunch of playstation 2's and creating video's with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I knew it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why would Osama bin Laden want to kill Dubya, his former business partner?
Bush is a TRAITOR. The crazy moron and Osama were in bed in business from waaaay back. Ask James R Bath about it. Then there're the warnings Bush got about using airplanes as missiles in July 2001.

Editor's note: In light of last week's horrific events and the Bush administration's reaction to them, we are reprising the following from the last column Jim Hatfield wrote for Online Journal prior to his tragic death on July 18:

Why would Osama bin Laden want to kill Dubya, his former business partner?

By James Hatfield

July 3, 2001—There may be fireworks in Genoa, Italy, this month, too.

A plot by Saudi master terrorist, Osama bin Laden, to assassinate Dubya during the July 20 economic summit of world leaders, was uncovered after dozens of suspected Islamic militants linked to bin Laden's international terror network were arrested in Frankfurt, Germany, and Milan, Italy, in April.

German intelligence services have stated that bin Laden is covertly financing neo-Nazi skinhead groups throughout Europe to launch another terrorist attack at a high-profile American target—his first since the bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen last October.

According to counter-terrorism experts quoted in Germany's largest newspaper, the attack on Dubya might be a James Bond-like aerial strike in the form of remote-controlled airplanes packed with plastic explosives.

Why would Osama bi Laden want to kill, Dubya, his former business partner?

I knew that bombshell would whip your heads around. So here's the straight scoop, folks.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Hatfield-R-091901/hatfield-r-091901.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. They've certainly made a name for each other
Dumby would be just another failed one-term Bush presidency, and bin Laden would be just another radical nutjob on the loose, but they managed to find each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Dead or Alive.
"pacifists and war supporters alike, can agree on is that bin Laden is a murderer who must be captured or killed."

Wrong!

It is inceredible to me that a Pres. of the U.S. would put out a reward of death on someone that has not been found guilty of what he has been accused of. There is zero hard evidence that Usama was behind the 911 Attacks. Usama has denied several times that he was not involved. Colon Bowel was supposed to supply the evidence and has never done so. I am not saying that he was not involved or that he was. Even if he had said that he was involved is not evidence that he was either. Merely saying someone did something is not evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Okay, so you don't agree
I'm pretty convinced that it was al Queda & bin Laden who bombed those buildings. And I'm also convinced that Bush LIHOP. But I should not have stated that everyone can agree, which of course will never happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinoza Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Uhhh, hows that again?
>There is zero hard evidence that Usama was behind the 911 Attacks<

Sheesh, just because we despise our great Pres, we don't have to talk like we lost 50 IQ points, do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Don't forget 02/13/02 - Bush says he's no longer interested in OBL:

"I'll repeat what I said: I truly am not that concerned about him."
George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Thanks!
How could I forget that - Bush admits he does not give a damn about the welfare of Americans under terrorist threat. Just simply does not care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.
Shortly after the 911 Attack the Bush Junta placed a bounty on Usama bin Laden. On exactly what evidence did they show that he was guilty of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think they just turned Prince Bandar loose in the country
and he rallied those 15 out of 19 Saudis to do their dirty work and the had their families and accomplices flown out of the country while the air space was closed to everyone else. I even think Osama, might, be a ruse. I think that's why they are trying to scare us again. All this mysterious intelligence. i wonder who they are torturing to get it? I bet that's why they can't be clear where the chatter about the connection is coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
33. He was the corporate candidate from day 1.
The public cannot be allowed to believe that elite corporations made a serious error in judgment, a disastrous choice. After all, they got big and powerful because of their superior judgment and sound choices, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. They are dancing partners (illustrated)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. What else would you expect from chimp? Success?????
Oh please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC