benburch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:08 AM
Original message |
We should start calling Bush "His Majesty" |
|
Yes, I'm serious.
Lets remind people that he is ruling as a King, and taking more power to himself and his treasonous family daily.
|
Coventina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
1. nah, it would only stroke his ego, and that of his followers. |
|
How about "his fraudulency"?
|
Ironpost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. At this point with all the crimes commited by * and co |
|
The higher you build them up the further and harder they fall. They will fall and soon.
|
DBoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I'll go for "Il Doofus" |
|
Mussolini's dumber relation
|
rkc3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Why not Roscoe P. Coltrane? |
|
CMT had a Dukes of Hazzard marathon on this past weekend and I nearly soiled myself watching Roscoe and his antics.
The only discernable differences between the two I saw were:
Roscoe has a slightly higher pitched voice Instead of "coo-coo", bush has his "tch"
Both have the same dragging of the c's and s's through their mouths - like con-schpiracy - and both work for fat little turds -- Boss Hogg vs. dick cheney.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm going to stick with 'stupid freaking piece of shit' |
htuttle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
TlalocW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Or however it's spelled.
TlalocW
|
sundancekid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. that's an unacceptable insult to the very kind story character! |
Rob H.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. How 'bout Little Lord Fraudleroy instead? |
stanwyck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
8. There's a logo for a white supremacist group |
|
(in USA Today photo today) which features a large W with a crown and a halo. Karl Rove is SOOOO jealous.
|
4MoreYearsOfHell
(943 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
Ironpost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Presi-debt sure rolls off the ole' tongue easy. I like it. |
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
11. nah, king isn't good enough, try: Messiah. |
|
He is the Bush Christ.
seriously. That's the level of adulation his supporters display...its WAAAAAY beyond a king.
|
independent_mind
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
|
You can't possibly be serious.
|
benburch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Calling him "President" only perpetuates the illusion that he has some right to be there. He does not, and the sooner we realize that viscerally, the sooner we will scour the White House clean of his filth.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
13. His Majesty, George II ? |
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
17. I have called him what he is: Emperor of Amerika, since Old America died |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-03-05 11:15 AM by tom_paine
in late 2000.
I will continue to call him and whoever succeeds him on the throne (it will be a member of THE PARTY, you can bank on that) until and if Amerika ever earns the 'c' back in our name and becomes a member of the Free World again.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |