Came across this;
"Steve Kellmeyer, a conservative Catholic who writes for numerous publications (with whom Heather and I had a rather lengthy and tendentious discussion about evolutionary language here in the comments), is writing a book, an essay for which now appears on his site. It's title of the essay is, and I'm not making this up, The Return of Child Labor. In it, he says a lot of things, the most striking of which includes:
'We have millenia of data to demonstrate that the agrarian model of apprenticeship transforms children into stable adults. An information society can implement that model today. At this point, America has literally no reason not to return to the agrarian model of child-rearing. Mass schooling doesn’t work and has never been successfully reformed. The child labor laws are anachronistic. Why do we retain either?'
As hilarious as it would be for the republican party to adopt repealing child labor laws into its platform, I'm wondering how widespread these opinions are in conservative circles. Does anyone have any idea?
I ask because the logic and method of the essay reads to me very much like wingnuttery I've read before. For example, we have our selective and unsubstantiated generalizations about history:
In an agrarian society, children are producers from almost the time they can walk. They work the farm side-by-side with their parents, thereby both putting food on the table and learning adult methods of thought and speech. Children in such a society are expected to pull their own weight and help provide for the family."
http://hereswhatsleft.typepad.com/home/I can't wait to hear Falwell on this one...