Demaholic
(97 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:12 PM
Original message |
You know that courthouse shooting thingy?? |
|
I read this response on a website and couldn't believe it...
(This, and many many other, situations happen because of our culture's out right embracing and absorbing of political correctness. Political correctness in this situation contributed to the death of these people.
There is no way in heaven this petite woman should have been guarding this man. PC is so ingrained they probably didn't even give it a second thought.
The confusion caused by ultra-equality (drawing no distinction between male and female in this case) foisted on us by the priest of modern 'liberalism' is the main factor that contributed here. In the county's grand efforts to create a Utopian gender-blended look for the police dept. they didn't want to 'discriminate,' so they hired this well-meaning but void-of-understanding-reality woman which matched the same void in the HR Dept. Then they showed an even greater 'sensitivity' in having this tiny woman escort this big strapping guy into the court.
Result, killing rampage that could have been avoided.)
Am I missing something, or isn't this guy a little off in his judgement here?
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Do you have a pic of the female guard? |
isit2008yet
(120 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. this reeks of Man Coulter. n/t |
Demaholic
(97 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:27 PM
Original message |
|
To him was this;
(And there it is...
The ultimate acumen of man.
Ballyhooed by the commoner of articulation and political correctness, we now delve into the realm of the supposed brass tacks of one, whom has harbored your innate passion to despise one political genre whilst unbeknown to you, enlist in an all out hate fest toward the true seasons of change that engulf and differ from that of his reality...
Not only abhorred by his words, I find it all too much confusing that anyone in their right mind could adhere to such rhetoric and unjust statements which thee are subjected to...
Simply put: Enough's enough!
Well versed in etiquette, a spade is a spade... And to my surprise (as easy as it gets), the X vs. Y factor would contribute in the ultimate atrophy of his own demise...)
Sometimes I wonder where they get this crap from?
Man Coulter? LMAO!
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So this guy took the little woman's gun and shot her with it. |
|
These same people are the ones that say every woman should carry a gun, because it's a great equalizer when they have to face a big man.
But this big man took the trained officer's gun, and shot her.
But my 72 year old mother would be safer if she had a gun, in case she was attacked.
My head hurts.
|
Caria
(241 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I heard that she was alone with him because |
|
she was the only one who showed up for work on time that day. That the men (2?) who were supposed to be on duty with her were 20+ minutes late.
|
DebJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
5. just heard a similar statement while flipping through cable |
|
channels...don't know which one though...kept flipping
|
troubleinwinter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Scroll down to Sunday, March 13, 2005 Conservative Blogger Michelle Malkin Blames Georgia Courthouse Slayings on Employment of Females By Law Enforcement Agencieshttp://nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/
|
Demaholic
(97 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Not going to waste too much time with this guy... |
|
His latest;
(Notice how he starts off with his typical tactics:
1. I'm a hater. 2. I'm not in my right mind nor is anyone who agrees with me. 3. I'm a sexist.
Since he is unable to comprehend or understand the deeper issues he still stays on the tip of ice berg, in the icing of the cake.
Here's a crazy idea, since I'm not in my right mind; why don't you illustrate and explain where I'm being hateful, loony and sexist instead of just calling me those things?
You can't go deep because you will drowned and choke on the cake. You're still in the foam.
Surprise me. Make me think. Cause me to engage you on a philosophical level. Lets talk. "Come let us reason together."
I dare you.)
Obviously blind to anything I have to say...
I will send him that link though... Thanks!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |