Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look on the Bright Side: ANWR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JackD76 Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:12 PM
Original message
Look on the Bright Side: ANWR
In ten years, we will have 578 days worth of oil. Yes, this does solve all of our energy problems. Just to let you all know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. ANWR Holds Between 6 and 16 Billion Barrels Of Oil
The world uses 80 Million Barrels of Oil per day.

6 Billion barrels = 75 days of world supply

16 Billion barrels = 200 days of world supply

The US uses 20 Million Barrels of Oil per day.

6 Billion barrels = 300 days of US supply = .83 years

16 Billion Barrels = 800 days of US supply = 2.2 years

It will take 5-10 years before a drop of this oil hits a refinery.

Hardly seems worth the effort when raising the CAFE standards would save more than we get with drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. And caribou meat on the table!!!!
...One republican said that ANWR is just a mosquito infested bog that no one would ever wish to visit, so that makes it ok to pollute with crude oil spills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Who needs an environment, anyway?
Global warming's gonna screw things up anyway, so we might at least get some gas for our SUVs out of the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Well, it really IS a mosquito infested bog
during the very short summer, but it should remain the way it is. It's not easy to get oil out of permafrost.

And I would still like to visit there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Was it a bog before the permafrost melted?
Whatta whore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. This vote was a procedural one...
And the vote to actually ALLOW drilling has yet to be debated. Moreover, the Senate can still stall out "permission" contained in the Senate's budget resolution by blocking the overall budget...which may yet happen.

All is NOT yet lost, folks!

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush cares about the wealth of his oil buddies
Reality and conservation for our children and grandchildren doesn't enter into his considerations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's if it ends up here and doesn't get exported
There is not a thing in the bill that would forbid GreedOCo from shipping the ANWR oil off to Japan, China or wherever. So much for "our national energy independence".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. 80-95% of the North Slope has been shipped to Asia over the
last 40 years. Anything out of Alaska is going the same way. Our government has no intention of unties our dependence to foreign oil. They've had 40 years to do something and have done nothing but allow SUV's to rule the highway. Won't change anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. It will go to the highest bidder just the way oil is being distributed
...now. Hey, who pays for the pipeline? That's going to take hundreds of billions in U.S. taxpayer money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. and that oil will all go to 'demockracizing' shock and awe machines.
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 09:47 PM by TrustingDog
toward some other country that can't defend itself. in the regular war ways.
Nothing to do with Aunt Millie paying a decent price for her Lectricity....
cool. /feh.

==
on edit: holy crap. it's Canada next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. added PLUS: another total destruction of Native Americans, by polluting
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 09:27 PM by diamond14

their WATER, destroying their FOOD, poisoning their CHILDREN, and deforming fetuses to prevent any possible reproduction....


even MORE plus: "company stores" for everyone....and work for their MASTERS, the OIL corporations.....


more PLUS: when it's all over, the OIL companies ALWAYS leave behind a total environmental disaster....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't think its about the oil at all.....
...its about precedent. They have succeeded in setting precedent for using protected land. The worst is yet to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC