Bouncy Ball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:30 AM
Original message |
Stupid fucking IDIOT "Democrat" calling in from California doesn't know |
|
what the FUCK she's talking about.
Glad this guy from Chicago is setting her straight.
|
Turn CO Blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message |
1. She was an idiot...said "I'm just glad" like 50 times |
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Now a Republican woman is calling them to account |
|
She isn't feeling the love about the INTERFERENCE between spouses!
Those clowns need to be careful what they wish for!
|
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
2. The ignorance of this case is maddening!!!!! |
|
First of all the Husband yielded his power to the courts of Florida. That never gets mentioned.
|
MidwestMomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, but so far the 2 Republican callers have been against the law |
|
and against their own party.
Interesting.....
|
chicagojoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I have a feeling there will be MANY more. n/t |
MidwestMomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Even the Fox poll was against this action |
|
That's got to tell you something.
|
Bouncy Ball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message |
6. So far we've had callers like this (taking notes on CSPAN callers): |
|
1. A Dem against it.
2. A republican against it. (!!!)
3. A Dem FOR the government being involved. (Who seems VERY uninformed.)
4. An independent against it.
5. A Dem against it.
6. A republican against it. (!!!) (Really thinking about the direction of her party, she is disturbed by this violation of state rights, this is a "power grab" by the members of my party, I am thinking about changing my party, I can't agree with what they're doing, they are putting themselves right into our bedrooms, right into the relationships between husbands and wives, they're saying 'we know better as to what kind of decision to make for you,' and that's something they used to accuse Democrats of! I'm really really upset about what they're doing. I think I'll be changing parties, I'm so discouraged.")
188 yeas now.
7. A Dem against it. Very pissed off. He argues for going through courts. Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (spelling?). States are sovereign, entitled to respect for their judgement. Keep non-federal cases out of federal courts, Congress has no right to do this. This is going to open some VERY messy doors, this is unbelievable.
199 yeas now. I want you guys to notice the yeas going up as the callers are calling in of BOTH parties saying Congress is WRONG to do this.
|
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Was the 3rd one (the uninformed Dem.) the one you could hear |
|
shuffling through to find out what the 1st amendment says?
|
Bouncy Ball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. No, that was a guy who was a Democrat against it. |
Neecy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
10. yes, a real "Democrat", that one |
|
Every Dem in Drier's district despises him - but gee, this "Democrat" was SO GLAD he's supporting this bill.
Dead giveaway - another Repig calling in on our line.
|
Bouncy Ball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yep, thus the quotation marks in my title line. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 03:20 AM
Response to Original message |