Sparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:27 PM
Original message |
Why didn't the media put this much effort in the White House Prostitute |
|
scandal than they are doing in the Terri Schiavo case? You can't tell me there was nothing there. That's bullshit. Do you remember all the airtime the Clinton/Monica fiasco got? I smell bullshit bullshit bullshit! Every hour on the three cable news shows they are talking about it (I don't watch but I know that is the case). I listen to cspan practically every morning and they are talking about it. To you liberal (and conservative) journalists out there that won't investigate this, you all are nothing but a bunch of COWARDS!
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. becuase the media DOES NOT say what is covered or a priority |
|
look at medicare...seems to be MUCH bigger issue ...IGNORED
|
wtbymark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. because the media is now just a propoganda arm of the GOP |
|
anything that hurts the GOP will not be seen on TV, anything that hurts democrats will be shown 24/7. It's very simple, welcome to Amerika.
|
libhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Hmmm - seems I recall another one party super power - uh, what was that, uh, oh, yeah - they called it the Soviet Union - you could vote Communist, or you could always vote Communist.
|
libhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Calm down -It's all Clinton's fault |
|
Remember? Which begs a question - for people who claim to hate gays, why are Rethugs so fascinated with Clinton's tallywhacker?????
|
Sparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Clinton isn't in the White House, so who cares if a former prostitute was asking questions from the press corps for the last two years. They love sniffing crotches except it wasn't Clinton's!
|
libhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Jacobin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Because it didn't advance the Corporate/Theocratic Agenda? |
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
6. is this a trick question? |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-23-05 02:00 PM by leftofthedial
Actually, they're not cowards. They are the ENEMY!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |