this person makes
excellent points! The 4-paragraph rule doesn't do this article justice, check it out:
The War on Michael Schiavo/The War Over Life
by Nicholas Stix
26 March 2005
Many of the people who have claimed to care so much about Terri Schiavo are motivated less by concern for her, than by their hatred for her husband, Michael.
Do you hate Michael Schiavo?
Many of the people who have claimed to care so much about Terri Schiavo are motivated less by concern for her, than by their hatred for her husband, Michael.
Well, what about legal principles? As liberal Harvard University constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe observed on the Lehrer Report in a brilliant stalemate of a debate with Jay Alan Sekulow of the religious conservative American Center for Law and Justice on Monday, there are hundreds of cases in America identical to the Schiavo case, but without Congress getting involved, and seeking to violate the principles of our legal system (such as crafting a law intended to apply to only one person, or seeking to usurp the judicial branch).
So that we’re clear, I do not support removing Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube. But I also do not condemn Mrs. Schiavo’s husband for his decision.
On a thread at the Free Republic message board discussing a particularly libelous rant against Mr. Schiavo, the psychotic rantings of the FReepers dominating the thread elicited a rational response from FReeper HMFIC: . . .
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article4235.htmlHe goes on to refute, point by point, a long list of erroneous and condemnatory accusations and ill-informed judgments against Michael Schiavo.