Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Hope The Next Pope Is Better Than This Past One

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 01:49 PM
Original message
I Hope The Next Pope Is Better Than This Past One
I'm sorry this Pope died and I'm sorry many DUers are sad over his passing, but I'm looking forward to there being a new Pope. Frankly, the Catholic Church needs a new Pope like a struggling sports franchise needs a new Coach or Manager.

Maybe the new guy will be energetic and lively. Hopefully he'll be compassionate and progressive and understanding.

Hopefully he'll consider stopping genocide in Africa and other parts of the world more important than stopping the spread of birth control and abortion throughout the world.

Hopefully he won't be a puppet of the people who select him and the institutional corruption that permeates the Catholic hierarchy.

Hopefully, this is a new day for not just Catholics, but for mankind as well.

Choose wisely Cardinals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have long
given up my Catholic ties (went to a high school seminary for three years), but this pope was pretty good when he first came in. He was actually quite progressive. Not so much in the last years which kind of makes me think that he was not the one making the decisions in the past years because he was not able. Which probably doesn't bode well for the next pope being progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. A little early, Magic Rat.
Edited on Fri Apr-01-05 01:57 PM by TwilightZone
Reports are that Fox jumped the gun (which led others to do the same), and the pope isn't actually dead yet.

Edit: link

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3402924#3402986
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. i'm sure he's dead
the Vatican is just not ready to announce it yet. Two weeks ago he was eating Scones and tea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The AP is reporting that the Vatican denied the reports and that
his heart and brain are still functioning.

I suspect that it'll be over soon, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Experts Agree, the Pope is either dead or alive
how long before we see that on CNN again? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hehe. Yep, that certainly fits.
This incessant need for news orgs to be "first" to proclaim an outcome is getting tiresome. The Pope's death will be reported thousands of times in the coming days, and no one will remember (or care) who was the first to do so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. The news of my death has been grossly exaggerated...
Mark Twain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. No Such Luck
I think we have been hearing from "the new Pope" for a while now.
Not a peep about Iraq (unlike the soon-to-be-departed JP2), and
lots about gays and abortion, in perfect harmony with the RNC and
the Fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. The way things are going, I doubt it.
The USA isn't the only country caught up in religious fervor. It's spreading around the world. In the present social and religious atmosphere, I'll bet the next pope will be even more conservative. (Even though it seems impossible).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. JPII was energetic & lively before the assassination attempt.
He almost died & his health was permanently affected. In recent years, the conservative Cardinals who run the Vatican had more control--that's the source of some of what you dislike.

The next Pope might make you appreciate this one better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. "the conservative Cardinals who run the Vatican"
You mean, the conservative Cardnials that JP2 appointed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. The new one is gonna make JPII seem like
a Unitarian... I mean it. Bad, bad times coming from the Vatican, my friends... I predict a break-off of the US, Canadian, and maybe Western Europe Church within the next 50 years.... (most US Catholics are NOT wingnuts, and are decently liberal, cafeteria Catholics)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. I find the position of pope to be an awesomely illegitimate post
Edited on Fri Apr-01-05 02:25 PM by Selatius
Who is anyone to claim to speak for God? Much less Jesus Christ himself? I don't need a pope to talk to God. I don't need his approval for anything that has always been my choice and mine alone. If I wanted to give up my gift of thought and reason, a gift God gave me, in favor of blind obedience, I'd be in favor of a pope, but I'm not, so I won't. I don't believe I was given the gift of freewill and reason so that I could throw it away for superstition and bigotry.

Don't mistake this for hatred of Pope John Paul II as a person. I wish no ill-will towards any man, and if he is about to expire, my he find peace, but what I hate is the exercise of self-claimed authority where no authority exists. That kind of awesome arrogance and conceit has no room with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. That isn't what the Church teaches
It teaches that one must believe Church teaching mentally and spiritually. Questioning and thinking is encouraged. The Bible isn't even considered the ONLY source for spiritual understanding and guidance. That's why the lives and works of the Saints are important. All anybody has to do is to be willing to continue to work towards understanding of Church teaching, not accept it on blind faith. It's actually much less dogmatic than, say, Baptists or other fundamentalists. And most of what a Pope says isn't infallible doctrine either.

Granted, alot of priests don't teach this as much as they should, but thinking really is a primary foundation of Catholicism. You think Gallileo would have came up with his ideas if freedom of thought wasn't encouraged? Or even Luther?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Lives and works of the Saints is very instructive indeed......
In the responsibility of the church for untold atrocities through the ages....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Not too objective
It's amazing how supposedly liberal and enlightened thinkers can be so incredibly narrow-minded when it comes to religion. You are aware there are scores of Saints who had nothing whatsoever to do with war or atrocities, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Of course, but why are the bad ones, the murderers, still Saints??
Kind of underminds the whole "saint" thing, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. If Recollention Serves, Sir
Not every Pope is canonized, not by a long sight....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Lots of reasons
Primarily the Saints aren't viewed as evil by everyone. If you're on the side of those killed, they're evil. If you're on the side of those they were fighting for, they're Saints. When missionaries went to "save" the "savages", their intentions weren't evil. In the end, we're all imperfect and the best of intentions can go horribly wrong. Catholics don't get the same benefit of the doubt lefty liberals do though. People may have suffered and died under Castro? Fingers in ears, la la la la, don't want to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. Who's putting Castro up for sainthood?
Sorry, in my mind torture and murder doesn't equal something worthy of veneration, no matter what the religious excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Galileo was persecuted for his work on heliocentrism, remember?
Edited on Fri Apr-01-05 03:22 PM by Selatius
Unless I am wrong in stating that he was tried by the Inquisition in 1633 and sentenced to house arrest. If I'm not mistaken, his book Dialogues was put on the church blacklist, until 1822. Are you serious in bringing up Galileo in defending the Roman Catholic church???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. How'd he get the idea?
Because learning and thinking was encouraged at the time. Divisons between enlightened and conservative have been going on since the beginnng of time I imagine. Then, like now, there were supporters and detractors. Church haters tend to focus on the detractors and ignore the fact that many Popes and Catholic leaders have done alot to encourage education and civilization.

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/galileoaccount.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. Well, it is because of cases like these that the church and state were...
separated to begin with. This is the raw argument behind church-state separation today, and it has been since the Enlightenment. While the church gets credit where credit is due, it should and must also be criticized where criticism is due as well. This is only fair, and while it may be true that Galileo got where he was because of the church, it is also true that he died under house arrest in his last years for "going too far."

The simple fact of the matter is that no matter if it was a progressive or conservative faction in power within the church, not any one of them had the God-given right to that kind of authority and power over others. Not one of them. That is what I mean when I mention illegitimate power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distressedsister Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. Condoms. AIDS. 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. Horrific, I agree
But my post wasn't about sexual doctrine, it was about freeom of thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. you gotta be kidding me...
So now you're going to credit Galileo and Luther to the Vatican?

Does it occur to you that free thinking occurs in individuals independently of what mechanisms a reigning church may have in espousing, suppressing, or controlling it?

The history of Catholic sponsored scholarship is impressive, though. It's a very intellectual church compared to what goes on at Bob Jones, I suppose. Excellent art. Really excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I credited the Vatican????
Wow. Selective reading.

If the Church were as stifling as people claim, as Bob Jones University is, there would have been no Galileo or Luther. It takes a level of freedom of thought to even gain the knowledge to lead to their ideas. That's what I said.

And yes, the history of Catholic sponsored scholarship is very impressive. Too bad people forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Matthew 16:18-19
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.


But you can find lots of support for your opinion here:
www.ianpaisley.org/toc.asp?loc=rome

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. That's reading *way* too much into a quote, IMO.
Edited on Fri Apr-01-05 03:33 PM by tjdee
If I'm understanding correctly, and I've heard this before, Peter was kind of like the first pope (if not indeed the first pope)--because of that *one* verse.

I never understood that. Eh, I'm not a Catholic though. I'd be curious in reading the history of the Pontiff, maybe I'll do some googling on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Apostolic Succession
It's not just the Catholic Church, others claim Apostolic Succession too. There's even a Lutheran sect that claims it. Pretty good overview here:

http://www.answers.com/topic/episcopalian-church-governance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Ah yes, but that's because Episcopals come from Catholics...
If my thinking is correct, Episcopalians are basically American Anglicans, and Anglicans came from Henry the eighth, who broke with the Catholic church when he sought a divorce that wasn't granted. (Perhaps that is the extremely basic kindergarten version of what happened.)

But thank you for the link--I'm interested in reading more about it, and I certainly wasn't aware that some Lutherans believe that.
In general, I think church organizations are kind of kooky...but that's another post for another time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Orthodox too
or vice versa, depending on which way you want to go with it.

Some sects that broke off from Catholicism chose to do without apostolic succession, some didn't. I'm not a religious historian, so I don't know why. Just that the doctrine isn't limited to the Catholic Church.

If one believes Catholicism and/or Orthodoxy is the original Christianity, than Apostolic Succession IS the way that verse ought be interpreted. Wouldn't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Oh, for sure.
I see what you're saying, and I think I was being a little short-sighted in my Protestant memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphadog Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. ???
Perfect, then you don't have to be a Catholic. What exactly is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. Point was to get my view out there and hopefully stir some debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xpat Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't count on an improvement
Edited on Fri Apr-01-05 02:27 PM by xpat
The lead horse in this race is Wotyla's enforcer.

Remember, these are the guys who suppressed Galileo, burned Giordano Bruno and collaborated with Hitler.

Is there any question in anyone's mind as to why the founding fathers hated organized religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. And yet, he'll still do something to piss off somebody somewhere.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm not pissed off at him
I think he was a severely flawed Pope, and will no doubt have to pay for the sex abuse scandal that occured before and during his rein.

He didn't stop it, when he probably had the power to do so. And he KNEW what was going on.

I don't hate the man though. I'm sure he was a very nice guy to those who knew him.

I just hope the next guy is an improvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I didn't say you were. Sorry for any inference. I'm just making a point.
Unless one is perfect, someone's gonna be mad. Whether it's decisions he makes or doesn't make. He'll be on someone's poop list...unless the world experiences utter and total peace during his reign. That is all I am saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. oh okay, sorry i snapped at you
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. It would be a breath of fresh air, wouldn't it?
I find the church's position on gays and lesbians absolutely unforgivable. It overshadows any good that may have been done, in my view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. people seem to think the few good things negate the bad things.
I respectfully DO NOT agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Or vice versa. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Perspectives
It really does depend on which direction one is looking from. The reactions would be the same if it were Bill Clinton or Shrub. Some would be upset, others would be 'happy,' and still others wouldn't give a flip one way or the other. What I find so disagreeable is we are being told HOW to feel about this event. My wish for the Pope is that his passing is better than those whom he and his Church turned their backs on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Except we all have "bad things". I surely would not want the sum of
my existance to rest upon the "bad things" that I have done. That's the point I am trying to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Agreed, that's a valid point.
The difference of course is that you and I don't have the power -- nor the many responsibilities -- of the pope, but I see what you're saying. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. I do hope for a modern one, especially for Dookus' sake.
hehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. There have been rumors that the next Pope will be Cardinal Ratzinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. Gotta love point 3
So abortion, the death penalty and war are all bad, but only abortion is really bad. This guy sounds like a fundy wet dream. And I say that as someone with a great deal of time for JPII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. I respectfully disagree
I'm not a Catholic, but I've studied history. I don't recall any Pope who was more involved in world politics (generally working for good) and more concerned with relations with non-Catholics.

I don't agree with every position he took, but if nothing else, he role in ending the Soviet Union made the lives of millions better.

I doubt any Pope is ever going to send Condoms to Africa so I don't see how that can be a criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
46. Believe me, if you're liberal you do *not* want a new pope.
Edited on Fri Apr-01-05 04:43 PM by deadparrot
I'm a lapsed Catholic, and this guy is probably about as liberal as its going to get for the next few decades (and he's not too liberal). They're expecting the next guy to be extremely conservative (as in, removing all musical instruments but the organ and banning girls from being altar servers, let alone priests). It's like a pendulum; Vatican II was the swing to liberal/progressivism, now it's swinging back the other way.

Of course, this guy was a surprise, so anything can happen, but the odds are against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Sounds like Nebraska today
in that women are pretty much banned from anything in the mass and if you question authority you run a good chance of excommunication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
49. From everything I've heard and read the next Pope will likely be MUCH more
...conservative than this Pope.

Not that I like (Actually the condom issue is barbaric IMHO)the policies of the current Pope, nor do I have any respect for the position either, but compared to what's about to happen JPII will look pretty good in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC