Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doctors, Hospitals Crack Down On Videotaping In Delivery Room

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:03 PM
Original message
Doctors, Hospitals Crack Down On Videotaping In Delivery Room
Doctors, Hospitals Crack Down On Videotaping In Delivery Room

SEATTLE -- Dr. John C. Nelson, an obstetrician, understands the desire of some parents to capture the miracle of birth on video.

But a few years ago, he put a stop to the practice among his patients for fear the delivery-room footage could someday become Exhibit A in court.

"What once used to be really fun and warm and cozy and so forth is now a potential nail in the coffin from a liability perspective," said Nelson, who practices in Salt Lake City and delivered babies until 2003. He is now president of the American Medical Association.

Many doctors and hospitals around the country are clamping down on videotaping in the delivery room out of concern those family videos could be used in malpractice suits.

http://www.local6.com/news/4344024/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well there is a question to ask when you are interviewing for a doctor.
This is bullshit. Every patient is a medical consumer and we can vote with our business.

When will the medical professional learn that lawsuits aren't the problem, bad doctors, and the culture that tolerates them is the problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. that's a dumb attitude for them
if it's not malpractice, then a videotape would vindicate you. If it is malpractice, you're putting patients at risk and you should be fixing the problem. Make up your mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh gosh we couldn't have an indisputable record
of what actually happened, now could we?

I would think that they would welcome the opportunity, unless there is something to hide. But hospitals would never have anything to hide would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. My Wife And I Just Had A Baby Girl.
When we went in for the first ultra sound it was that doctor's first day. He made us a video of the whole exam.

When we came back he was very nervous and when we asked him about a tape of the second exam he refused and told me that his practice was not happy with him when he told them he gave us one.

It was a lawsuit thing. He did make us a cute little video of the her face for us the second time but, that was it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's the "don't get caught" ethic at work.
It's not about actually improving and eliminating cases of malpractice ... it's about not getting caught. Ethically bankrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. If they were smart
and everything were above board they would want to tape everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Video tapes of complicated procedures where you really need multiple...
cameras providing different POVs can be (and have been) grossly misrepresented and misinterpreted in court by lawyers and laymen jurors. I can see why the doctor/hospital would make such a rule. Also, they have every right to.

That said, I am strongly against tort reform in case anyone was wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC