Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why shouldn't we give Andrea Dworkin the same respect we gave the Pope?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:37 PM
Original message
Why shouldn't we give Andrea Dworkin the same respect we gave the Pope?
I'm not a fan of Andrea Dworkin, nor was I a fan of Pope John Paul II. But it seems to me that both individuals were famous, controversial, somewhat anti-sex, and very polarzing. So why shouldn't we exhibit the same basic respect for Andre Dworkin that we did for Pope John Paul II? By that I mean shouldn't we restrain ourselves from posting jokes about her death and from making insensitive comments about her supporters? Good heavens, Andre Dworkin's corpse is still warm. Shouldn't we wait to dance on her grave until she is actually in it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing is sacred. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Certainly, but it seems we have a double standard here
DUers were required to at least be respectful of the feelings of followers of JPII. Why should he rate above Andrea Dworkin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why should anybody "rate" above anyone else?
Strip away radical feminism's myopic fixation on male power and what you have is a wish for the banishment for all heirarchical structures, which I think is the noblest goal of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. My point exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
47. Halle-frickin'-lujah.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
53. Everything is sacred.
"For everything that lives is holy." William Blake said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't notice...
....a whole lot of restraint being exercised over the Pope's death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I sure did
Anything that could be considered the least bit irreverant was deleted, mostly to avoid nasty flame wars and cries of bashing, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrankBooth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. I didn't notice a whole lot of restraint in Dworkin's philosophy
either. Separate planets for the sexes is basically what she wanted.

I hadn't even heard she died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree.
After all, I'm sure somebody somewhere worshiped and admired her.

Nope, no double standards around here, no siree.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. who gave respect to the pope?
remember on his watch coverup, payoff and reassignment was the response to sexual deviancy and molestation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. does this apply to ALL public figures?
at what point are we allowed to dissent? (this isn't a complaint, it's just a question).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Maybe we should be allowed to dissent from the get-go
Or maybe it should be up to each individual DUer to draw that line for him or herself rather than enforce sensitivity and tasteful dialogue on each other. After all, the mods were trying to prevent a holy flame war, not avoid bad PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. I'm not sure how true that is...
...I think one of the mods even posted something to the effect that those with negative views of the Pope should keep quiet in part because it would make DU look bad to slag off a recently deceased Pontiff.

Ironic, really, considering that the people from which DU seeks to avoid criticism largely see Catholicism as the work of Satan, and that the Pope once referred to their fearless leader as a possible antichrist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who is Andrea Dworkin?
I seriously have never heard that name before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Seriously...and I know everybody
There are very few public figures that I don't have at least a passing knowledge of since I read so damn much. But I'm drawing a complete blank on this one.

I'm probably familiar with something of hers if she's a writer. Otherwise, I got nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Andrea Dworkin had a huge impact on the debate over pornography
Both in this country and in Canada. She was quite well-published and quite controversial.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Oh. Her.
The Anti-Male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. Uber-radical feminist
Radical probably isn't a strong enough word to describe her brand of feminism. You might call her a 'faith-based' feminist whose dogmas were as strong as those of any fundamentalist religious group's. She was surely at one extreme in the continuum of feminist theorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Of course we should.
Common decency is just good manners, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. She must not be that famous...
I never heard of her until I read she was dead. No one I know has ever heard of her.

Maybe it's a baby boomer thing? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Not really, no
Andrea Dworkin was quite a well-published, famous and infamous feminist who had a huge impact on the pornography debate in this country and Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Okay...that rings a bell
Did she align herself with the fundamentalists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. On pornography, yes
They often cited her work, until they realized she was a lesbian. Being gay is like kryptonite to these folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I'm a Gen X'er and I've heard of her...
And she herself was a baby boomer.

She gained minor notoriety in the 1980s for her anti-sex screeds. But you probably wouldn't have heard much about it if you lived far from the coasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I read her in college, early 1990s
And IIRC, Amercian Booksellers v. Hudnut was sort of a big deal.

I think it's a disservice to write off Dworkin's writing as anti-sex screeds. Her take on sexual politics in general, and pornography in specific, did talk about inter-gender relations from an adversarial point of view. But of course, writers and philosophers have been doing that since the dawn of the written word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Do you know who Flo Kennedy was?
Bella Abzug?
Alice Paul?
Gloria Steinem?
Barbara Jordan?
Shirley Chisholm?
Sojourner Truth?
Susan B. Anthony ?
Germaine Greer ?
Mary Wollstonecraft?

.....just a few....just curious...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I've heard of 6 of them.
Edited on Mon Apr-11-05 01:28 PM by Connie_Corleone
That's because I've heard their names all the time or heard about some of them in high school.

No, I did not know about Shirley Chisholm until she died either.

Names like Mary Wollstonecraft and Bella Abzug weren't topics of conversation in my neighborhood growing up, okay??

Yeesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. They should have been covered in school
Mary Wollstonecraft especially. She was absolutely instrumental in early feminism.

Flo Kennedy was very funny. Try reading some of her stuff sometime, I think you'll find it thought-provoking AND entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. In order....
Bella Abzug? no
Alice Paul? no
Gloria Steinem? yes
Barbara Jordan? yes, yes (in honor of her speaking style)
Shirley Chisholm? yes
Sojourner Truth? yes
Susan B. Anthony ? yes (She made her own dollars, right?)
Germaine Greer ? yes
Mary Wollstonecraft? yes

I did go to college. In fact, I wrote my senior thesis on Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton, Adrienne Rich and Marilyn Hacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I'm a Dorothy Parker kind of woman myself
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Now that's a woman...
You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. She had a biting wit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. That's why my not knowing this person seems odd to me
I was an English major and took a ton of sociological and political classes at my very elite, very liberal college. I obviously even did some writing on feminism. So, I feel like I should know major figures in the movement. I now have some vague memories of her, but I remember thinking that she was pretty fringe.

I definitely know of the unholy bond between feminists and fundamentalists against pornography and dismiss anyone who would make such an alliance as a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I accept Dworkin as part of the history of the women's struggle
Maybe because she was seen as "fringe" by many...to include others within the women's movement...a push was made to keep her outside the "mainstream" of the women's movement ( regards to thinking and literature)?...turning her into an obscure reference that only us "die-hard feminists" would know about. :)

Also, getting into bed, politically, with right wing fundies is enough to discredit anyone...

talk about sleeping with the enemy... :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. theboss...
I had the same exact answers that you had. I don't know either Bella Abzug or Alice Paul either. As for Dworkin, I agree that now is not the time to discuss what I don't like about her. I hope her passing was painless, and I hope she finds peace now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. I've heard of all of them
And Andrea Dworkin is not in their league. Not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Like Dworkin or not, she's part of the history for the struggle
to obtain equality for women...a struggle that continues today. Her name will be found among that history and there's no erasing it. Not if truth is to be valued.

I fully embrace the "women's movement"....flaws and all. Doesn't mean I agree with everything ever said in the course of the struggle....just means I accept it's history without the revisions and commentary. Dworkin is a part of the history that icludes those other names.

Just as Catherine MacKinnon and Molly Yard will be....

Some greater than others in their words and deeds....but ALL a part of MY history as a woman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. that's fair enough, and true enough
but I believe she'll be there as little more than a footnote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. A lot of people were pretty hard on the pope too.
Both of them had their good points and band points. I see nothing wrong with talking about them.

Rejoicing in their death is a bit beyond the pale though. They were not murderous despots or anything like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. I considered her intelligent and capable of inspiration --
-- but also a MAJOR retro mind on subjects like pornography.

She received due praise and criticism during her life and her death changes nothing in that regard. She forged her own legacy and she'll have to take the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. Don't you know silly, "It's a man's world!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. Little to compare the two
Edited on Mon Apr-11-05 02:12 PM by kwassa
There are vast differences between these two people. The Pope is the titular head of one of the world's largest religions. Dworkin is not even head of the American feminist movement, which is not religious but political. He has a vast following, she has a tiny following, if any at all.

(I'm supposed to respect someone for being anti-sex and polarizing? I hardly think that JPII was polarizing, even as Popes go.)

That said, of course we should not make the jokes, but DU can be a very juvenile place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Did you do that on purpose? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
43. Some people on DU seem to see her as the enemy
They have reduced her message to: sex is bad and porn is bad. Those are of course obviously the most important rights for them. They don't understand that her arguements and reasoning behind them. She made arguements that others had not dared to make. These arguements contributed to feminist thinking and enabled us to be able to see a more balanced view. Before the feminist movement, the predominant view, of course, was strongly sexist in favor of men and still is to some extent.
I'll agree that Pepe John Paul II and she are different. The Pope was meant to be a somewhat mainstream Catholic leader. Ms. Dworkin was not mainstream nor tried to be. Her point was to have these issues heard. The Pope knew that his issues would be heard as they were not major deviations from mainstream Catholic thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
45. What about Zell Miller?
Sure, he's not dead yet, but its just a matter of time.

Will we all look back on this 'democrat' in quiet reflection? Will we curb our tongues to avoid hurting the feelings of Georgians or our more conservative Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. oooooooooh, that's good!
Amazing how some didn't even get within a country mile of the point.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. My personal rule,
whether it's Dworkin or the pope or Reagan or Zell or the guy down the street, is to speak well or not at all until the body is in the ground. After that, honest discussion of the person's successes and failings is appropriate... Even then, gleeful grave dancing or gratuitous slamming seems wrong to me.

Regardless, everyone has to make their own choices in this, and I don't think we should enforce any rules of what and when can be said...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R. A. Fuqua Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. an intelligent, well-spoken and classy woman.
she will surely be missed. And hopefully she will be a role model to many more women in the future.

I respect her MORE than I ever did the Pope, but can not speak for anyone but myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. No. I don't want to see a crackdown on speach each time someone croaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
51. It is a rather interesting comparison...
I think more people accept the sexism of the pope (of all popes - of the institution of the pope) than accept Andrea Dworkin's views of sex/men.


As far as "exhibiting ...respect..."

Some people wanted us to all to pray for Jerry Falwell - fercryinoutloud - and he wasn't even dead (or a feminist :) ).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. That's assuming they know who this woman was?
(God help me, but I've been dying to say this).

I've never heard of the broad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
52. I offer the same respect to them both, which amounts to little indeed.
I still don't understand why death should change my response to public figures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. Truthfully?
I just asked four people if they knew who Andrea Dworkin was...they were all waiting for the punch line, they thought it was the start of a joke. I then asked them if they saw the Pope's funeral, and they are still talking about it.

I don't know who she is, can't pretend I do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
55. Didn't she advocate all heterosexual sex is rape?
With Mary Daly and that crowd?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC