ZombieNixon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 07:53 PM
Original message |
I hate Bush and Reagan equally! |
Terran1212
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
1. You shouldn't discriminate |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's hard for me to hate anybody as much as I hate Junior |
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
serryjw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I can say a lot of bad things about Reagan |
|
BUt he isn't as bad as * and he didn't try and destroy the Constitution.I think he really loved this country. I don't agree with much of what he did/didn't do, BUT in his heart he was trying. * is nothing to help. He and all the neocons have their own agenda and it doesn't include us.
|
politicaholic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Loved his country? Three words - "Arms for hostages": |
kliljedahl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Didn't like Reagan & worked against him, but he wasn't nearly as evil as *. I have such a visceral loathing of dumbyah, & I'm old enough to remember Nixon. I've never felt anything like this. http://www.kliljedahl.net
|
politicaholic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I would go see Reagan's grave, but... |
|
hauling down the big boom box sounds like such a pain in the ass...unless of course they planned ahead and installed speakers in his head stone with 24 hour dance music. Then I could do my jig on his grave with minimal inconvenience. Wasn't that what the eighties were all about?
|
TheFarseer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
6. bush is a million times worse than Raygun |
|
at least bush should know better. Raygun was half senile and probably didn't know nearly as much about public policy as he pretended to. If you can't say anything else nice about Raygun at least the USA was widely respected during his administration. bush has made us public enemy number one.
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I hated Regan for what his policies did to me personally but I hate bu$h |
|
for what his ignorance is doing to our children's future. Regan stole our present in the 80's bu$h is stealing our kids future, that gets me madder than I have ever been and makes the hate in me swell like never before.
My hate for this guy is far greater than for reagan.
|
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Save your hate for the living, the dead won't notice. n/t |
wakeme2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
11. But now the good news |
|
What can they name after Bush when he is gone
Think about that.
His father got his name on an aircraft carrier. They are not going to name a second Aircraft carrier after him.
Reagon has got him name on most things in DC.
Bush Senior got his name on the CIA building
Jr already has the Houston Airport named after him.
Maybe the Navy could name a sub after him, but then it would be along side the sub named after Carter.
I have a hard time thinking of things to name after him that they have not already named after his father....
|
AverageJoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. How about the * Sewage System in Crawford, TX? |
|
Or maybe the * Insane Asylum someplace?
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. The george W bu$h Neclear waste dump site. |
|
The emblem for the front of the building could be a giant *
|
aaronnyc
(183 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Without Reagan there is no Bush |
|
Reagan was a true radical for his time; he pushed America and the Republican Party far to the Right. Reagan ended the era of Republican Party representing fiscal conservative libertarian ideals.
Reagan brought in the Religious Right - not Bush. To this day, both Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson say that Reagan is their favorite president. Reagan was also the first Republican president to have total disregard for the fiscal responsibility; he ran up enormous deficits in his rush to cut taxes for the rich and to increase defense spending - once again Bush has simply followed in these foot steps.
Reagan also used racial code words to effectively bring down liberalism, and start a conservative revolution. He was also responsible for knocking traditional northeast "Rockefeller Republicans" out of party control, and pushing control of the party to the South and West.
I know this will not go well over here, but Bush does not represent some extreme wing of the GOP. He represents the mainstream of the Republican Party, and the next Republican presidential candidate will probably be just as conservative as Bush. Reagan put a great deal of the Party power structure in the hands of evangelical southerners; without their support it is nearly impossible to get the Republican nomination.
Reagan was personable enough to put a friendly face on extreme conservatism; thus, middle America which was terrified of Goldwater was willing to accept Reagan, Their acceptance of Reagan has subsequently led to their acceptance of the likes of Gingrich and Bush Jr.
I really don't see how Bush's policies are so much more conservative than Reagan's were. After Reagan's death I saw some liberals saying that he would be "rolling over in his grave" if he saw what Bush had done to America. Frankly, these people are either way too emotional regarding Bush, or they are using some revisionist history regarding Reagan. If we are supposed to judge history by the context of their times, then Reagan should be considered much extreme than Bush ever was. Along those lines, I actually think that Reagan was probably worse than Bush.
|
AverageJoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. I agree with what you say about Reagan |
|
though I would use the term "reactionary" for both Reagan and *, rather than the no-longer applicable "conservative."
That said, and agreeing that Reagan was absolutely horrific, I think * is at least as bad. He is a pocket version of Reagan--smaller and meaner and, god help us, dumber. True, he's only following in Reagan's footsteps, but I don't think that makes him any less awful
Both of these men are monsters, plain and simple.
|
BearClaws
(223 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. As Bad As Reagan Was... |
|
At least he could sound intelligent during a conversation. This Moron is a national embarrassment! Other nations assume that he is the smartest American we have!
|
AverageJoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. You make a good point |
|
* makes Reagan look smart and statesman-like. Hell, he makes Dan Quayle look smart and statesman-like.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |