mopaul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 08:59 AM
Original message |
wal-mart to match it's store's acreage with conservation acreage |
|
just heard a guy talking about it on cnn. the talking head also said he knew the walton family PERSONALLY, and that they were very environmentally active.
in other words, i think, for all the acres that wal-mart uses in it's existing stores, many thousands, it has purchased conservation acres to match it, put aside to never be developed.
and they sure wanted us to know about it, cause it was on cnn.
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I think they feel a bit besieged. |
|
trying to let us know that they aren't that bad. Bryant Check it out--> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
How much are they going to donate to replace all the local businesses and good-paying jobs they drove under?
|
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |
|
..... How much land and raw materials are sucked up in their endless consumer driven orgy? How much greenhouse gas in China to make their crap?
Expect to see "fuzzy bunny" commercials from Wall Mart, now.
|
AG78
(840 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Apr-13-05 09:13 AM by AG78
we would live, work, eat, sleep, and have sex in Wal-Mart when it owns everything. But instead, we'll live in the woods when not working, shopping, and dining at Wal-Mart.
Which would be fine by me, I'm all for a simpler way of living. But that crazy ass dream doesn't involve Wal-Mart. Bastards! Well played Walton's, well played indeed.
|
dweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message |
5. yet, then the *moron administration |
|
will exploit the area for oil ... right?
dp
|
northzax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
because the law pretty much says they have to. A large percentage of big box retailers, especially in the exurban/rural areas, are built on, or next to, wetlands (where's a nice flat place for a parking lot? wetlands) which, under EPA rules, have to be replaced. So they manufacture wetlands on useless property (notice the ponds next to the driveway into the Walmart? that's a 'wetland' Google "walmart wetland" for all the times they've settled cases by building 'new' wetlands adjacent to the ones they plowed under.
|
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-13-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
7. This is a lame and transparent move my WalMart. |
|
It does absolutely nothing toward addressing the real problems created by WalMart.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |