Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Personal videos clear RNC convention protesters of charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:04 PM
Original message
Personal videos clear RNC convention protesters of charges

Not marginally either. The private videos show amazingly different details than the officers sworn accounts of the details of arrest: (Hundreds of cases dropped)


Videos Challenge Accounts of Convention Unrest

Dennis Kyne put up such a fight at a political protest last summer, the arresting officer recalled, it took four police officers to haul him down the steps of the New York Public Library and across Fifth Avenue.

"We picked him up and we carried him while he squirmed and screamed," the officer, Matthew Wohl, testified in December. "I had one of his legs because he was kicking and refusing to walk on his own."

Accused of inciting a riot and resisting arrest, Mr. Kyne was the first of the 1,806 people arrested in New York last summer during the Republican National Convention to take his case to a jury. But one day after Officer Wohl testified, and before the defense called a single witness, the prosecutor abruptly dropped all charges.

During a recess, the defense had brought new information to the prosecutor. A videotape shot by a documentary filmmaker showed Mr. Kyne agitated but plainly walking under his own power down the library steps, contradicting the vivid account of Officer Wohl, who was nowhere to be seen in the pictures. Nor was the officer seen taking part in the arrests of four other people at the library against whom he signed complaints.

<snip>
Last week, he discovered that there were two versions of the same police tape: the one that was to be used as evidence in his trial had been edited at two spots, removing images that showed Mr. Dunlop behaving peacefully. When a volunteer film archivist found a more complete version of the tape and gave it to Mr. Dunlop's lawyer, prosecutors immediately dropped the charges and said that a technician had cut the material by mistake.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/12/nyregion/12video.html?oref=login


So...The police "mistakenly" edited the parts out of their OWN video that showed protesters acted peacefully when faced with arrest.

In another amateur vid, protesters are shown obeying police orders to march down a particular street, then being arrested by another group of police for....marching down that street.

In future protests I can imagine videographers to get special attention from police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where is the outrage?
Come on New Yorkers, jam the city phone lines with complaints about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. They must belong to the Party of Nixon.
"Accidental editor" Rosemary Woods would be proud.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee, wasn't LYING ON THE STAND or PERJURY a punishable offense?
I vaguely remember something like that in 1998 or 1999 being kinda illegal . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Note to self, have a camera at all protests I attend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Maybe not anymore?
:eyes: Since they were protesting against dear leader. Can't have that. People might be on to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy_Montag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do you not have perjury laws?
I mean if he's given a sworn statement, surely that leaves him open to six months of painful anal sex in a state correctional institution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. In Vino Veritas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh God
This is so disgusting. Martial law anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC