Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The progressive method to deal with ANWR and "Big Oil"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
queeg Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 10:14 PM
Original message
The progressive method to deal with ANWR and "Big Oil"
There seems to be a lack of practicality when dealing with the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, and where some oil companies want to drill for oil.

Shit, SELL IT TO THEM--here's the offer:

A--cost is $1,000,000 per acre

B--land will only be sold in 1 section (640 acres, 1sq mile) portions.

C--there will be no rights-of-way granted


What this means is that if the oil companies want it enough they can pay off the national debt in one fell swoop. ---Say they want to drill in a place near the center that will take a 20 mile road to get there. ---they will have to pay for each section they build the road on plus the section they want to drill.

640 acres times 20 miles = 12800 acres

12800 acres times 1mil per acre = $12,800,000,000

plus another 640 mil for the section to drill on.


---I say take the 12 billion, and buy Cuba or something---splurge a little.

and if the oil companies want to pave the whole fucking thing----great I say---let them buy it--its about 1.5 million acres--

that'll be 1,500,000,000,000 ----or----1.5 trillion dollars

---I say tell them we take PayPal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Big Oil Is No Longer Interested, At Any Price
Big Oil Steps Aside in Battle over Arctic
By Jeff Gerth
The New York Times

Monday 21 February 2005

http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/E022205Y.shtml

A Bush adviser says the major oil companies have a dimmer view of the refuge's prospects than the administration does. "If the government gave them the leases for free they wouldn't take them," said the adviser, who would speak only anonymously because of his position. "No oil company really cares about ANWR," the adviser said, using an acronym for the refuge, pronounced "an-war."

. . .

"The enthusiasm of government officials about ANWR exceeds that of industry because oil companies are driven by market forces, investing resources in direct proportion to the economic potential, and the evidence so far about ANWR is not promising," Mr. Kelley said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC