Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MediaMatters weighs in on Time's "Coulter Edition"!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 05:46 PM
Original message
MediaMatters weighs in on Time's "Coulter Edition"!
A lovely bit of work by Jamison Foser. :)

While embellishing Coulter's legal work, pretending it was something more than partisan hackery, Cloud downplays Coulter's history of outrageous comments, unquestioningly quoting Coulter friend Miguel Estrada downplaying her vicious attacks as "a little bit of a polemicist" (Coulter herself sees no need for the qualifier; she told the Sunday Times of London that "I am a polemicist. I am perfectly frank about that") and writing that "Coulter can occasionally be coarse."

"Occasionally" coarse? A "little bit" of a polemicist? This about a "commentator" who claimed that the Democratic Party "supports killing, lying, adultery, thievery, envy"; who said of the idea that the American military were targeting journalists, "Would that it were so!"; who said President Clinton "was a very good rapist"; who insisted that "iberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole"; who said that "I think a baseball bat is the most effective way these days" to talk to liberals; who said it was lucky for former senator Max Cleland's political career that he lost an arm and two legs in Vietnam; who has said her "only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building"; and who wrote that the only real question about Bill Clinton was "whether to impeach or assassinate."

What, exactly, would it take for Time to declare that someone is "frequently" coarse?


More here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coulter is truly a sick human being. (That's an understatement.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. She also said,
Conservatives believe in God, Liberals think they are God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoa! Good one!
Man is she a wench! Hateful little snot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm curious why that last statement about Clinton didn't get her...
in serious hot water with the Secret Service. I've known people who got a knock on their door simply by agreeing that they wouldn't shed a tear if President XYZ were to drop dead of natural causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. True...even before we had Homeland Security Police
that sort of talk was never taken lightly. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. She made a comment on Bill Maher that needs questioning
I can remember it verbatim, but she was asked something about women voting and her answer was "well, I didn't give them the right to vote" or some such. Does she think women shouldn't vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I found the interview transcript
but I still don't get it. It's just there...see? I couldn't even make sense of it in context.

MAHER: And what about your boyfriend, Ronald Reagan? He would have sat there for seven minutes? You don’t think--

COULTER: The difference is Ronald Reagan—

MAHER: You don’t think you’re—

COULTER: —Ronald Reagan would not have been reading at a school. My objection is that the most powerful leader in the world is taking the time to sit in kindergarten classes and read textbooks as president. But I’m not the one who said women should have the right to vote.

MAHER: But you don’t think you’re working backwards from your devotion to George Bush to what is the right thing to do? If Al Gore had been president and was sitting there for seven minutes, you’re telling me you wouldn’t be chopping off his head for that?




What'd she mean by that? Beats me. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think she's saying that if women didn't have the right to vote
Presidents wouldn't have to do warm and fuzzy photo ops with kids in order to pander to the women vote. I guess Coulter thinks that men don't care about their kids education. Truly pathetic.

Coulter thinking and writing is disorganized and skips from subject to subject. This interview transcript points that out. A truly deranged mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And implying that's *all* women care about...
...which is equally pathetic.
Luh-luh-luh-loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC