a "margin account" built on a loan that must be paid back - leaving one with real cash only if your investment did better than the interest rate Bush charges you on the "loan"-
a fact perhaps made amusing when you realize that the "loan" is built by taking payroll taxes from you - and then telling you you must pay them "back" so as to buy an annuity.
As explained in the Washington Post, the latest - Progressive indexing"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/04/30/GR2005043000201.htmlThis method would leave benefits untouched for low-wage earners but would phase in cuts for people earning $25,000 or more. Those earning the taxable maximum of $90,000 would experience the steepest cuts. The plan would not affect people who are currently 55 or older
..... more .....
But the summary is that this is a way to avoid increasing the wage cap which "hurts" the rich - so it is better to hurt the middle class
- and along the way split everyone else from the poor and perhaps
undermine the entire Social Security system -
a gift from our compassionate conservative who brings people together.
Also of interest is
http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/issuebriefs_ib145The Perils of Privatization: Bush's Lethal Plan for Social Security" by the Economic Policy Institute...
Excessive rates of return -- The Bush proposal assumes an excessively high rate of return on personal accounts- an average real rate of 6%, but future returns are likely to be much lower. Present rates cannot persist nor will returns over the next 75 years equal those of the past 75-primarily because the stock market is currently overvalued. Expert opinion is predicting future returns over the next 75 years to average 4.0% to 4.5%, adjusted for inflation. Returns on bonds in the Social Security Trust Fund are expected to average 3%, after inflation. Even the 1% to 1.5% advantage of stocks over bonds will largely be erased by the higher overhead associated with equity investments.
Moreover, the stock market has shown that it can produce long droughts for financial investors. In the twentieth century, three different 20-year periods-1901 to 1921, 1928 to 1948, and 1962 to 1982-have generated average real rates of return of 0%. Under such circumstances, private investments in equities will not provide sufficient returns for a decent standard of living in retirement.