Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leno: This is funny: 49.9% pick Davis; 1% pick Arnold and Arnold Wins

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FullCountNotRecount Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 11:50 AM
Original message
Leno: This is funny: 49.9% pick Davis; 1% pick Arnold and Arnold Wins
Talk about American Democracy being the shining beacon for the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't more people notice this?
It is this factor that, in my opinion, makes the recall challengeable on constitutional grounds (state and/or federal): the recall is one thing, and voting for a replacement is another. In the present situation, if the recall passes, then the eventual winner doesn't need to get anything near a majority of the votes in order to be elected. And that on its face is unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. No , it's not unconstitutional.
It's a state election and this procedure IS part of California's Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FullCountNotRecount Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Has it ever been challenged in Supreme Court?
My point is that you could get less than 1% and win. Then there'd be another recall and another and another. It's not fair and not what the founding fathers intended. They wanted a Constitutionally-limited Democratic Republic. They didn't want the voters running to the polls every week when they change their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think the real question is,
Does Davis meet any of the criteria for the re-call? He is not insane, he has not been caught in a crime, He IS fit to serve his term as Governor.

I believe that the recall had conditions attached to it that no one has talked about. A bad economy is not one of those conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Their is no criteria other then a sufficient number of signatures.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 2 VOTING, INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM, AND RECALL


SEC. 14. (a) Recall of a state officer is initiated by delivering
to the Secretary of State a petition alleging reason for recall.
Sufficiency of reason is not reviewable. Proponents have 160 days to
file signed petitions.
(b) A petition to recall a statewide officer must be signed by
electors equal in number to 12 percent of the last vote for the
office, with signatures from each of 5 counties equal in number to 1
percent of the last vote for the office in the county. Signatures to
recall Senators, members of the Assembly, members of the Board of
Equalization, and judges of courts of appeal and trial courts must
equal in number 20 percent of the last vote for the office.
(c) The Secretary of State shall maintain a continuous count of
the signatures certified to that office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hmmm, I thought that there had to be extraneous circumstances.
But if there is no good reson to recall other than the fact that you lost, then I think that won't pass constitutional muster if brought up before the supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. But this is not just a recall...
...it's a recall-plus-election with over 135 candidates! And the statute you cite says nothing about how the successor is chosen -- who came up with the current brilliant plan? I'm guessing that it could be challenged on California Constitutional grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The founding fathers have would have nothing to say .
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 12:34 PM by bowens43
It's a state issue, not a federal issue. The federal government has nothing to say about how the states chose a Governor. If the state Constitution said to chose a Governor by throwing a dead chicken out the window of the capital and seeing who it hits, from a federal point of view, it would be constitutional.

The ninth Circuit court shouldn't have stopped the recall vote just as the supreme court shouldn't have become involved in the florida election mess. Elections fall entirely in the realm of states.

The 10th Amendment:

Amendment X - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people

No where in the Constitution is the United States given the power to control how a state chooses it's Governor.

Don't get me wrong, I think the whole recall thing is ridiculous and inherently unfair, but IMO it isn't unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Until the Civil War,
South Carolina never had a vote for president.

The Legislature just named a slate of electors who voted.

Completely Constitutional, and it would still be today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FullCountNotRecount Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Supremes Invalidated CO election which allowed Gay discrimination?
Or am I mistaken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FullCountNotRecount Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. CA law prohibits noncitizens being paid to pass petitions
So the law is not being strictly adhered to because Issa hired many out-of-staters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. stupid idiot
Leno stopped being funny years ago

----

Just wait until the recall election

There will be a shit storm if Davis is recalled but a Republican wins with a smaller % than voted to keep Davis.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think people are realizing how awful the alternatives are
Also, more people see how easily some schmuck can get in wiht about 20% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. If a repuke wins be sure and start a recall
all's fair in love and war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Don't worry Swede, that is set in stone
the very next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Leno is is a Dennis Miller(cutting edge) wannabe
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 12:09 PM by oasis
with an overwhelming amount of Jay's material cutting at Democrats. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Leno jokes equally about both sides
He mentions the stolen election quite a bit. Leno may not be particularly funny, but he does give it to both Dems and Repubs; nowhere close to Dennis Miller, a neocon sellout shit licking piss ant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Leno still cracking Bill Clinton/ Monica "jokes" despite a wealth of Bush
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 02:10 PM by oasis
subject matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. sorry wayne, I haven't noticed anything equal about Leno
but thats only my opinion, I could be wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scaramouche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. What people don't realize is that anyone could win and it would be legal.
We've all heard the urban legend how Mickey Mouse is the most popular write-in cadidate.

Chech out some of these folks:

http://www.techtv.com/unscrewed/specials/story/0,24682,3521969,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. The law to me is obviously flawed, but
I really don't hear anyone talking about changing it after this mess is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. what is NOT funny, Leno -
is that digusting hacks like YOU help make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertrand Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Leno isnt funny
not because he bashs Clinton or Dems, but because his material is stale and obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC