FullCountNotRecount
(860 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 11:50 AM
Original message |
Leno: This is funny: 49.9% pick Davis; 1% pick Arnold and Arnold Wins |
|
Talk about American Democracy being the shining beacon for the world!
|
ljm2002
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Why don't more people notice this? |
|
It is this factor that, in my opinion, makes the recall challengeable on constitutional grounds (state and/or federal): the recall is one thing, and voting for a replacement is another. In the present situation, if the recall passes, then the eventual winner doesn't need to get anything near a majority of the votes in order to be elected. And that on its face is unconstitutional.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. No , it's not unconstitutional. |
|
It's a state election and this procedure IS part of California's Constitution.
|
FullCountNotRecount
(860 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Has it ever been challenged in Supreme Court? |
|
My point is that you could get less than 1% and win. Then there'd be another recall and another and another. It's not fair and not what the founding fathers intended. They wanted a Constitutionally-limited Democratic Republic. They didn't want the voters running to the polls every week when they change their minds.
|
Robin Hood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I think the real question is, |
|
Does Davis meet any of the criteria for the re-call? He is not insane, he has not been caught in a crime, He IS fit to serve his term as Governor.
I believe that the recall had conditions attached to it that no one has talked about. A bad economy is not one of those conditions.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Their is no criteria other then a sufficient number of signatures. |
|
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 2 VOTING, INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM, AND RECALL
SEC. 14. (a) Recall of a state officer is initiated by delivering to the Secretary of State a petition alleging reason for recall. Sufficiency of reason is not reviewable. Proponents have 160 days to file signed petitions. (b) A petition to recall a statewide officer must be signed by electors equal in number to 12 percent of the last vote for the office, with signatures from each of 5 counties equal in number to 1 percent of the last vote for the office in the county. Signatures to recall Senators, members of the Assembly, members of the Board of Equalization, and judges of courts of appeal and trial courts must equal in number 20 percent of the last vote for the office. (c) The Secretary of State shall maintain a continuous count of the signatures certified to that office.
|
Robin Hood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Hmmm, I thought that there had to be extraneous circumstances. |
|
But if there is no good reson to recall other than the fact that you lost, then I think that won't pass constitutional muster if brought up before the supreme court.
|
ljm2002
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
23. But this is not just a recall... |
|
...it's a recall-plus-election with over 135 candidates! And the statute you cite says nothing about how the successor is chosen -- who came up with the current brilliant plan? I'm guessing that it could be challenged on California Constitutional grounds.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. The founding fathers have would have nothing to say . |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 12:34 PM by bowens43
It's a state issue, not a federal issue. The federal government has nothing to say about how the states chose a Governor. If the state Constitution said to chose a Governor by throwing a dead chicken out the window of the capital and seeing who it hits, from a federal point of view, it would be constitutional.
The ninth Circuit court shouldn't have stopped the recall vote just as the supreme court shouldn't have become involved in the florida election mess. Elections fall entirely in the realm of states.
The 10th Amendment:
Amendment X - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
No where in the Constitution is the United States given the power to control how a state chooses it's Governor.
Don't get me wrong, I think the whole recall thing is ridiculous and inherently unfair, but IMO it isn't unconstitutional.
|
Yupster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
South Carolina never had a vote for president.
The Legislature just named a slate of electors who voted.
Completely Constitutional, and it would still be today.
|
FullCountNotRecount
(860 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
21. Supremes Invalidated CO election which allowed Gay discrimination? |
FullCountNotRecount
(860 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
22. CA law prohibits noncitizens being paid to pass petitions |
|
So the law is not being strictly adhered to because Issa hired many out-of-staters.
|
dobak
(808 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Leno stopped being funny years ago
----
Just wait until the recall election
There will be a shit storm if Davis is recalled but a Republican wins with a smaller % than voted to keep Davis.
|
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think people are realizing how awful the alternatives are |
|
Also, more people see how easily some schmuck can get in wiht about 20% of the vote.
|
Swede
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If a repuke wins be sure and start a recall |
|
all's fair in love and war.
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
16. Don't worry Swede, that is set in stone |
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Leno is is a Dennis Miller(cutting edge) wannabe |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 12:09 PM by oasis
with an overwhelming amount of Jay's material cutting at Democrats. :puke:
|
_Wayne_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. Leno jokes equally about both sides |
|
He mentions the stolen election quite a bit. Leno may not be particularly funny, but he does give it to both Dems and Repubs; nowhere close to Dennis Miller, a neocon sellout shit licking piss ant.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Leno still cracking Bill Clinton/ Monica "jokes" despite a wealth of Bush |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 02:10 PM by oasis
subject matter.
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. sorry wayne, I haven't noticed anything equal about Leno |
|
but thats only my opinion, I could be wrong
|
Scaramouche
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
8. What people don't realize is that anyone could win and it would be legal. |
|
We've all heard the urban legend how Mickey Mouse is the most popular write-in cadidate. Chech out some of these folks: http://www.techtv.com/unscrewed/specials/story/0,24682,3521969,00.html
|
Yupster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message |
17. The law to me is obviously flawed, but |
|
I really don't hear anyone talking about changing it after this mess is over.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
19. what is NOT funny, Leno - |
|
is that digusting hacks like YOU help make it happen.
|
Bertrand
(764 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-03 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
not because he bashs Clinton or Dems, but because his material is stale and obvious.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message |