Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Sex tourism"?!?! WTF

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:46 AM
Original message
"Sex tourism"?!?! WTF
I was watching "The Daily Show" at a local bar last night and caught a clip of Whistle-Ass babbling and bumbling before the UN and it seems that Whistle-Ass is now pledging to crack down on sex tourism of all things. Not that sex tourism doesn't need to be cracked down on but when and how did the "war of terror" take that particular detour. This guy just pulls anything out of his ass and throws it in front of the UN. Remember the millions promised to fight AIDS in Africa? Yeah, me neither. Now there's THIS shit. I can barely make enough sense of it to compose a decent rant.
WHAT....THE....F*CK!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. It Is A Real Issue
Sex tourism does exist, but since it young children and women are the victims, no one cares - until Assmunch* needs a sexy issue to distract from his latest enormous fuck-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FullCountNotRecount Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Ironic? French tourists to other nations must follow France consent laws
France convicted a couple of guys who went to Thailand for young virgins.

Also, remember when they suggested Jesse Ventura's visit to Cuba was a sex tour?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. women are the perps too
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 06:05 PM by seekthetruth
don't you know about the american women who travel to the caribbean for the big bamboo?? ;-)

THAT'S probably what he wants to stop, lmao!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. .
If Bush was serious about decreasing "sex tourism",
he would take away Neil Bush's passport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. This Just In
Neil Bush appointed to head Anti-Sex Tourism Division in the Dept. of Justice. Film at 11:00!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Well that is it. I have had just about all I can take.
Who will run for prez on the Peter Principal or shall we just let Bush keep the job? By the way who will take the blame for the UN speech? Someone has to be where the Buck Stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. There is such a thing ...
There are "tours" one can take of SouthEast Asian countries and pay for sex with minors - we're talking children in some cases.

But as I keep saying, he's using this as a "with-us-or-against-us" card to the world. But a lot of countries are seeing through this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Don't get me wrong
I realize that sex tourism exists. I know exactly what it is and the fact that countries like Thailand are the main destinations for it. It was just so strange hearing him pull that out of the air, especially after his supposed commitment to fighting AIDS in Africa. And we all know how THAT went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. He's pretending to care about an issue
that the rest of the world cares about. Its a bout as close to co-operating witht eh world community this treasonous bastard can get. Somehow I think the UN delegations will be able to see through his shallow attempt at pretending to be a sane member of the world community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. And just like a typical Repuke
He won't unite with the world community over something like global warming or Iraq but mention S-E-X and bingo there's something that will put a match under his ass--at least for the next two minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. I agree ...
it has nothing to do with the situation in Iraq.

To me, it's just a "common issue" he's trying to use. What country would support it?

Of course, he failed to mention that only the US and Somalia have not signed the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah...
somehow I imagine an entire world scratching its head and asking "Where'd that come from?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Chimpington managed to do something...
Never seen before, with that speech: A campaign speech, for his red-meat supporters, in front of the UN General assembly. That's what it was planned to be, and considering its content, that is what it was; a campaign speech.

Don't think that fact is lost on the nations of the world, either. I am sure that in UN cocktail parties, for the next few months, the murmurings will be QUITE scathing.

Everyone knows that cocktail parties are where the real meat 'n taters go down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Forgive me for repeating myelf but....
I am totally cynical about why George brought it up today. Hearing him talking about it was jarring, and I am sure he is using it for stupid political reasons.

But I am glad he brought it up.

Modern slavery is one of the most important human-rights problems today. It should have been a central international issue years ago. There is no excuse for ignoring it. It is not a partisan issue.




All over the world, millions of people are enslaved and living short, miserable lives because of it. Sex slaves. Child slaves. People held prisoner on plantations as slaves. All over the world.

Sorry if I sound like a self-righteous prig, but this really is a heartbreaking issue -- and a major problem today.Whatever the reasons, I am glad he brought the subject up. It is one of the major failings of our society that we are ignoring it.


Read about it, and then see how you feel.


http://www.antislavery.org/

http://www.iabolish.com/

http://users.erols.com/bcccsbs/bass/bass.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Thank you for that post
Slavery ought to be a nonpartisan issue. Unfortunately, that's not the way it works.

If past examples are anything to go by, Bush will pledge moral support to the cause of ending the traffic in human beings. However, when it comes time to pay the piper, he will be AWOL.

In the speeches yesterday, two visions of the UN and its mission were presented. One, Bush's, was based on moralism, an appeal to common moral sentiments presented in black and white simplicity. The other, best articulated by Chirac I believe, was a call for greater consensus in international affairs, a reform of the mechanisms by which consensus is arrived at in the Security Council and General Assembly, and a call for greater democraticization on economic issues, and for the industrialized countries to take steps to help all nations meet to the Millenium goals.

Bush received a cold reception because of his obvious hypocrisy. By invading Iraq, esp. the way he did it, he thumbed his nose at the UN and its charter. His utter contempt for the diplomatic process led many to conclude that he was insincere, that his administration would stop at nothing in pursuit of naked venal interests.

It's like a western where the sherrif shoots men in the back, in plain daylight over objections of the townspeople, and then when some new hombre comes to town, the sherrif gets all high and mighty about cattle-rustler this, horse-thief that. Stone cold silence. The townsfolk won't hear a word of it. Of course they mistrust drifters. And they mostly think stealing a horse is a hanging offense. But this sherrif has no moral legitimacy in their eyes.

Well, that's a simplistic allegory, but Dubya's rhetoric doesn't warrant much more than that. He wants moral clarity, but in those terms, he's wearing the black hat in this town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vikingking66 Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. that's going to endear him to the business community
If they can't spend their tax cuts on Thai boat boys, they're going to be very unhappy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, but.....
Yes, I agree that sex tourism is a problem to be addressed.

BUT

Why the hell did it come up in this speech to the UN? Certainly the pressing issues of Iraq and Afghanistan were the issues of the day. The "sex tourism" part of the speech took the focus off of the most pressing problems. I have a theory but I won't hijack your thread with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. I think his point was to show everyone
that this was not a speech asking for help in Iraq.

It is just Bush's annual address to the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is their soccer mom talking point
Also stokes the fundies, who are so appalled at all matters sexual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. IIRC...this is not the first time he has talked about this
and no, i don't have a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JewelDigger Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Heck, Soccer moms don't know * even spoke at the UN yesterday!
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 09:05 AM by JewelDigger
n/t

(on edit: typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Fundies are always worried about their kids being abducted
and sold into white slavery.. About every 3 months or so, there are stories on tv about cute little blonde girls being forced into prostitution.. Every time I see these, there is always the obligatory comment about how religious the family is and how the family is such a strong and healthy family and they just don't know how this happened..

Fundies who HIDE everything about life from their kids, only make them more curious and vulnerable..

Children/teens who are aware and have critical thinking skills , rarely fall for the scams out there just waiting to ensnare them..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's his latest weapon of mass distraction
Shame on you for criticizing him for it--do you mean to say you SUPPORT the child/sex trade? Well, either you're with it or against it!!!


rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sex Tourism: Probably A Euphemism For a Crackdown on Cuban Travel
I've lost most of my credulence regarding the George UU Bush administration and its pronouncements. Dubya's new campaign against sex tourism is probably less a genuine campaign against "sex tourism" than a cover story for imposing even tougher travel restrictions for non-Cuban-Americans wishing to visit Forbidden Island. Does anyone else remember the Bushie/CANF carping regarding former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura's plans to visit Cuba? The right-wing critics implied that he was planning to be a "sex tourist."

Just as the Radical Right portrays any displays of adult erotica as "child pornography" and any cultural dissent from what right-wing evangelicals consider permissable as "pornographic," now we have any Americans wishing to defy the Republican/Cuban exile lobby travel restrictions labeled as "sex tourists."

I'll admit in retrospect that former president Bill was shifty at times, but the incumbent Republican administration is so mendacious that it's going to leave Bill Clinton looking like Parson Weem's portrait of George Washington by contrast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Parson Weem on President Clinton
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 10:44 AM by WoodrowFan
BOL! Thanks, that's a great image. :yourock: I can't help, however, but to think for President Clinton that "The Cherry Tree" is a strip club though...


And yes, I think Clinton was a very, very good President. Doesn't mean I can't chuckle at him being a horndog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osolomia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Bingo! Bush will use this to justify vetoing lifting the travel ban

Hence the timing of this.

Florida’s kingmaking Cuban-American “exiles” are threatening to dump their support for Bush if he doesn’t live up to his promises to them.

Last March Bush tightened the travel restrictions on American-Americans and put a stop to educational exchanges to Cuba.

But last week the House voted 228-177 to lift the travel ban altogether.

The next day Bush announced that he was placing sanctions on Cuba, Burma and North Korea because of their “sex trade”. The sanctions include banning educational exchanges.

The Senate is expected to vote on the amendment to lift the travel ban in the next week or so. Bush promises to veto it and is desperately seeking a reason for doing so, hence:

U.S. Clamps Down on 'Human Trafficking'
Wednesday September 10, 2003

WASHINGTON (AP) - The United States will impose economic sanctions on Burma, Cuba and North Korea for failing to take steps to stop ``human trafficking,'' such as forcing people to work or engage in sexual acts against their will, the White House said Wednesday.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3131754,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Thank you
Now I see what it's REALLY about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osolomia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Problem is, Dems go along with it without batting an eye

Bush imposed sanctions 2 weeks ago, the AP story was posted on LBN at the time and sank like a stone, but even after raising it at the UN all the threads on DU show that nobody has a clue what’s going on much less oppose it, much too busy dwelling on fantasies for reality to register. What a shame! Nice to see exceptions to the status quo though, bravo!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. If he wants to crack down
He should look to his Daddy's company. One of the Carlysle Group's subsidiaries, DynCorp, has a bad problem with their people overseas taking advantage of underage prostitutes, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nedlogg Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sex Tourism?
What the hell is this and where do I sign up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. You really don't want to sign up for this.
Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I agree, unless you
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 12:25 PM by WoodrowFan
I agree with Skypilot, unless you LIKE the idea of having forced sex with AIDs infected 13 year old Thai girls sold into slavery by their families.... :puke:


(and I'm sure you don't, but a lot of people don't know just how awful this situation is...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. Wouldn't this particular issue....
...be limited to the wealthy (say top 10%)(primarily repugs)? Great way for the self-absorbed to spend a tax cut!

I work for a living, and could not even afford the fantasy of a sex tour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Actually
I think any scumbag with a passport and a few extra dollars can afford to be a sex tourist. It's when they start requesting virgins that they might have to put out some big bucks, from what I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. My info is a little dated and things may have changed,
because there were women's groups protesting, but it used to be quite common for companies in Japan to reward (male) workers with sex-tours to S Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines or Thailand. So I got to thinking it was a Japanese problem. But then when I visited Thailand for the first (and only) time, and stayed in a B-class hotel (cheap), I was REALLY shocked to find that there were groups (yes, organized tours) of sex-tourists from Germany, Italy, France and England--all staying at the same sleazy hotel. I saw them in the lobby, the elevators, talking openly. This doesn't mean that Americans aren't also involved--and maybe there are even tours for them too. (My info is definitely anecdotal.) But if fewer Americans are doing this on tours, more are there individually, I think. And around every US military base in the world there are sex-industry enclaves--so other Americans visiting know exactly where to go. Maybe they just don't need the tour guide.

But if I'm right, and Europeans and the Japanese (and probably the affluent of a lot of other countries, too) tend to go in organized tours more than Americans do, well then, this is the perfect issue for bashing the rest of the world. (I do think sex-tourism and the horrors associated with it are legitimate issues of concern, but I do not think Bush* is raising them altruistically.)

I also thank the poster above for the Guardian-AP article s/he posted. It explains a lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. My sister is a flight attendent
A male flight attendent who she knows, who can fly all over the world free, vacationed in Thailand. He went to a rather upscale place where he paid less than I and many other Americans make in an hour to spend an hour with a woman. The expensive part would be the flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. WhistleAss can start investigating His Poppys WH first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. * will send US military to Poland, Bulgaria and Romania unaccompanied
as soon as Rummy figures out which German bases he's going to close (which will be those without a hospital/military training area).

There's nothing in the world that will entice (re)enlistments like cheap sex, even if it involves slavery. And that's all Poland, Bulgaria and Romania will have to offer unaccompanied military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC