Oracle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 10:50 PM
Original message |
Vote now in SF Chronicle poll, on the debate... |
flamingyouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Voted for GangBang (ha ha ha).
|
jenk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It looks like swatzennegger is ahead |
Oracle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. No, I think Green Party candidate Camejo is ahead with 31% |
janekat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. The Greens are "freeping" the poll I guess... n/t |
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. uh, no...San Francisco is a liberal place |
|
They know who real liberals are
|
Greyskye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. Did you actually watch the debate? |
|
I'm not a Green, had never heard Camejo speak before, and knew nothing about him. However, I watched the entire debate (minus a couple minutes dealing with a small) and felt that Camejo won. I have a feeling that a lot of other folks feel the same way. That's not 'freeping', that's being honest.
I felt that McClintock placed 2nd, even though I disagree with just about everything that comes out of his mouth. That's being honest too.
|
Oilwellian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Camejo has pulled ahead by a large margin.
|
eablair3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
17. looks like Camejo more than maintained that early lead in this poll (nt) |
Democrats unite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |
Oilwellian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. I just heard Mike Malloy say Camejo is the Green Party candidate. |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Camejo is winning now! |
RichM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Camejo leading -- with 1024 votes cast, he has 31% |
Oracle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. That's great for the Greens, but bad news for the Dems... |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 11:14 PM by Oracle
Although Davis is getting 6% even though he wasn't there... that could be added to the Dem column, I suppose?
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. Green voters are very strategic. If 43% liked Camejo or Bustamante most |
|
I'd say that the Dems are doing OK.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I tell my Cal friends to vote McClintock in polls except on election day. |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 11:13 PM by oasis
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
14. voted for Davis even though he wasn't there |
eablair3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-03 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I thought Camejo won the debate |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 11:23 PM by eablair3
like the article said, he stayed above the fray, made his points, backed them up with a lot of substance.
If you like sound bites like "I have a role for you in Terminator 4" or "your personal taxes have a loophole so large I could drive my Hummer through it" or "that's how you treat women" == then you might like Ahnold or Arianna. Arnold didn't say much about what he was going to do to fix what he thinks is wrong, he was just gloom and doom with no substantive ideas to correct what he thinks is wrong. For instance, Arnold said "I will cut worker's comp ins rates in half" --- but he never said how. Will he regulate rates? Further regulate and reduce the compensation to injured workers? He said nothing.
Unfortunately, I thought Cruz was not impressive. He kept getting ripped and allowing himself to get talked over while saying "yeah, Arnold, yeah Arnold, yeah Arnold" and "yeah Arianna, yeah Arianna" etc. I was disappointed with Cruz' letting himself get walked over.
The substance definitely belonged to, in order -- Camejo, McClintock and then trailing by a ways was Cruz, with Arianna and Ahnold at the end.
The Greens are real strong in Calif. The Greens got more votes in the last SF Mayor election than the Repubs. There are approx a couple hundred elected Greens at the local level in Calif.
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
20. In that sense, Arianna may have done a good job |
|
She was the counterpoint to AHH-nold. It may not have influenced a lot of voters but Arianna is there reminding people what AHH-nold's candidacy means.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
he was so refreshingly clear and in command of his positions. i'm not in california. but if i was, he would be my choice. he's so right about the greens making progress. what a gentleman.
arnold is nothing but a glad handing joke. he'll be the pawn of the party to go around the state to help get R's elected. like the party really cares about him besides using him for its own gain? not! he's their court jester and attention getter. it's embarrassing. his wife should tell him.
|
RichM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Very odd - 20 hrs later, 6872 have voted, & the %'s have barely budged |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |