Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEEDED- Dana MIlbank's article just after W's Oct.7th speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:44 PM
Original message
NEEDED- Dana MIlbank's article just after W's Oct.7th speech
Washingtion Post. I looked through their archives and it seems to be gone. :shrug:

This was a great article in which Milbank shoots down W's three main points of the speech:
Aluminum tubes
Drones
Centrifuge (seeking nukes)

He/she ( :shrug: )also gives the first peek out how W&Co. operate. The article quotes several anonymous sources (CIA/NSA/Los Alamos) as saying that they were asked to check or support these assertions (as well as others) and when they couldn't they were told to keep their mouths shut.

I can't find it. Anyone have an idea or have it saved. A shot in the dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Check your message box
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 02:09 PM by librechik
I sent you a nexis lexis version--hope it's the right one (no link)

seems a bit less than what you need--check the post below for other suggestion (although later in OCT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Look here....
For Bush, Facts Are Malleable

By Dana Milbank
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 22, 2002; Page A01

President Bush, speaking to the nation this month about the need to challenge Saddam Hussein, warned that Iraq has a growing fleet of unmanned aircraft that could be used "for missions targeting the United States."

Last month, asked if there were new and conclusive evidence of Hussein's nuclear weapons capabilities, Bush cited a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency saying the Iraqis were "six months away from developing a weapon." And last week, the president said objections by a labor union to having customs officials wear radiation detectors has the potential to delay the policy "for a long period of time."

All three assertions were powerful arguments for the actions Bush sought. And all three statements were dubious, if not wrong.
(cut)

http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/noframes/read/722
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC