Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Osama winning?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:45 PM
Original message
Is Osama winning?
Since 2001 our country has been in a death spiral. It's like an avalanche! Really all he did was roll a snowball down the mountain...Bush* did the rest.

• loss of civil liberties
• economy in the tank
• increase in poverty
• loss of the middle class
• major cities destroyed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. and not to mention:

U.S. troops out of Saudi Arabia

Secular Iraqi government replaced by Islamic theocracy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep
I wanted to add those two to the list - and lets add that Osama hasn't been smoked out either

Yep Osama did much much better than hitting the trifecta!

I tell people all the time that Osama couldn't have planned this better if he tried - the freak in chief played right into his hands - hmmm maybe not - maybe that was the plan all along - since Osama been forgotten is still at large
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Baiting Bush into the Iraq showdown.
Which Osama was smart enough to know would become a quagmire and leave ourselves weaker at home or if we legitimately needed to be somewhere else.

Not to mention how it breeds more hate for us which turns into recruits for Al Queda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not sure about that
but we did show him that we can't handle a natural disaster and with 3 days warning. Homeland security..HA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyLasky Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think its more about who is losing...
and that seems to be everyone. The people of Iraq, the US, and Britain just to name some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Welcome to DU, are you really a lasky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iraq to become an Islamic theocracy
Also what bin laden wanted... he hates secular governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. excellent article on terrorism strategy here:
http://www.gurus.com/dougdeb/politics/TS101.html

well worth reading, excerpting 2 paragraphs:

In radicalizing your sympathizers, who is your best ally? No points awarded for “the media” or “sympathetic foreign governments.” In radicalizing your apathetic sympathizers, you have no better ally than the violent extremists on the other side. Only they can convince your people that compromise is impossible. Only they can raise your countrymen’s level of fear and despair to the point that large numbers are willing to take up arms and follow your lead. A few blown-up apartment buildings and dead schoolchildren will get you more recruits than the best revolutionary tracts ever written.

Perversely, this means that you are the best ally of the extremists on the other side. That doesn’t mean you love or even talk to each other – they are, after all, vile and despicable demons. But at this stage in the process your interests align. Both of you want to invert the bell curve, to flatten out that big hump in the middle and drive people to the edges. That’s why extremists come in pairs: Caesar and Pompey, the Nazis and the Communists, Sharon and Arafat, Bush and Bin Laden. Each side needs a demonic opposite in order to galvanize its supporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC