rlev1223
(593 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 10:46 AM
Original message |
Two articles, same theme: ideological inevitability of disaster response |
eallen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
1. This could be a major theme for Democratic resurgence in 2006. |
|
Our own version of a contract with America: the notion that there are some public functions that government legitimately serves, that those who are elected to office should believe in those functions, fund them, and staff them with people who are experienced and competent, that running these functions on the basis of ideology wastes public resources, and that free-market fundamentalism undermines the very social framework in which capitalism thrives.
|
rlev1223
(593 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
...that some version of "see, the federal government can't solve problems" creeps up as a repub meme, perversely using their own ideological dismantling of federal functions to justify further "starving the beast" with the planned continuation of tax cuts.
|
enough
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. They will certainly try to do that. |
|
These are two good articles.
Krugman really nails with his usual clarity:
snip>
But the federal government's lethal ineptitude wasn't just a consequence of Mr. Bush's personal inadequacy; it was a consequence of ideological hostility to the very idea of using government to serve the public good. For 25 years the right has been denigrating the public sector, telling us that government is always the problem, not the solution. Why should we be surprised that when we needed a government solution, it wasn't forthcoming?
snip>
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |