Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS News: Hurricane strength "Only 1 MPH is due to Global Warming"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:14 PM
Original message
CBS News: Hurricane strength "Only 1 MPH is due to Global Warming"
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 09:09 PM by omega minimo
This is how it's done folks. Little choppy soundbites, throw in some movin' pitchers, an expert or two and a newsbot to deliver the punchline.

:wtf:

The Expert Weather Wonk said-- like he was assessing the quality of ballpark hot dogs-- "147 miles per hour winds. ONLYONEMILEPERHOURISCAUSEDBYGLOBALWARMING. If it could be measured, it would be TOO LITTLE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE."

Cut to this and then that and back again and meanwhile WE the gullible public are not supposed to wonder:

HOW THE HELL DOES HE KNOW THAT "ONLYONEMILEPERHOURISCAUSEDBYGLOBALWARMING"?

And the punchline from the plastic newsdroid?

"So the answer to the question: Is This Global Warming Is... Not Really."

:smoke:

on edit:
I'm sorry-- it WAS CBS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Disney has to convince people there is no problem
After all, the have made quite an investment in real estate in the heart of hurricane country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The World of Tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes, and I'm sure that when the seas rise, and Nebraska has a coast
they'll claim all is well and good in 'Murika. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. As long as Reality is what the Tee Vee tells us it is
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw that at 6 pm CDT & ruined another keyboard.
bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Don't ya love the quick cut technique
for catapulting the propaganda directly into the bloodstream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where'd he find that statistic-a Cracker Jack box?
I know scientists studying climate change in Antarctica who would have a thing or two to say about that. Hell, our weather forecasters here in Central Florida admit frequently that unusually high sea temps turn tropical depressions into deadly hurricanes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The Bureau of Bogusness
The piece was about the 35-40 year "hurricane cycle"as if this is "normal"--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Interesting. This is the talking point my mother brought up.
Is there a "hurricane cycle"? Apparently there were some hellacious hurricanes in the past, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. The pretense that natural cycles cancel out additional influences is bogus
Bogus statistics groom greater gullibility in the public.

AND THE PROVIDE-- oops, sorry-- and they provide "Talking Points" for bonehead dittohead TVheads.

God/dess help the DUer who has a conversation with someone who regurgitates "Only 1 mileperhour is caused by global warming."

:grrrrrrrrr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Therefore, keep burning fuel like crazy, everyone.
Yeah. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. NBC said the same thing tonight
It was a man from the National Hurricane Center. They must have way better models than anyone else in the world to make such a precise estimate of the effect. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. WTF?!! This makes no sense whatsoever...
How can they possibly specify that it's only 1 mph?

I think it's at least 2 mph. :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Actually, it's 1.9328748...
...32424985764231986129364123409236812370213408234701234012378123441231032403241014321234907143258901234512349123490914023901505142378909014235014236712346213478243109821370124350213409672130947812930759014237590324601237409172850634059761234097502345091239012643065430609160912312364506324051320409123590613241209476290134501432501240712346120340213465021783409812734 and a half, but who's counting? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Pie!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Apple? Peach? Cherry? Hey, I think those guys should eat
CROW PIE!

haha.

~Shine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FM Arouet666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Can't be something which will hurt industry
I saw some Cato institute stooge make the same assessment. Chimpy accepted less information as a pretext to taking this country to war than exists to support global warming. But then again, his priorities are directed toward keeping "Americans safe from terrorism." Add silly texan accent to the quotes for the full impact.

With the GOP in charge, we will all be living in a polluted green house, but how could anyone have anticipated such a global disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No one but the science fiction writers/filmmakers of the 1970's
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why, it's almost like the Oil Companies control our government and media..
Oh wait, they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Is it worth noting how they catapult the propaganda?
The rapid fire BS seeps in and do folks stop to think.....

oh, never mind :crazy:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I'm sure many around the world wonder how we can be hit....
with monstrous hurricanes year after year and yet deny the existence of global warming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. We really need to make a list of these people..
.. because now they are showing themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. What??? Water temps in the Gulf are almost 10 degrees above normal
Look what happens when water temps in the Pacific are only 3 to 5 degrees above normal. You get El Nino and one hell of a lot more energy and rainfall in the Western United States. It's not the air temperatures, it's the water temperatures that are fueling these storms.

Water temps in the Gulf of Mexico in the lower 80's would be hard pressed to churn up a cat 3 storm much less a cat 5 storm. We are seeing Cat 5's because water temps are WAY above normal. Even if global warming has only increased water temps a few degrees I can't believe that wouldn't be enough to increase the destructive power of a storm many times.

I would like to know where they are getting this info and what it's based on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Enter Cognitive Dissonance
You are making so much SENSE (you too Gloria :hi: )

SO-- part of the game here, the bit that got my attention is:

The Company puts some goon on the tube to say:

"Onlyonemileperhouriscausedbyglobalwarming"

AS IF that means something-- AS IF he's an Expert

AS IF it is scientifically plausible to make an assessment like that or a statement like that

AND IF the lowly public doesn't unnerstan we mus be dum or sumthin, right?

AND IF the cowed public soaks this mindwarping in and REPEATS IT--

Much easier to say: "Onlyonemileperhouriscausedbyglobalwarming" than to actually be INFORMED or like, you know, THINK.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. But, the point is, that global warming is causing more storms,
not about the wind speed!! Right??

And, wind speed isn't the big thing, it is the storm surge that is critical, according to what I'm reading from the weather guys.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Meteorology types I know
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 08:43 PM by ewagner
aren't ready to concede that there are either more or more powerful hurricances due to global warming. They aren't denying it, they just can't prove it and there certainly hasn't been in depth research into that particular effect.

The really, really good meteorologists are scientists and test everything according to scientific and rigid standards.

Truth?

They really don't know yet.

on edit...a very good reasonable discussion here:

http://flhurricane.com/cyclone/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=weatherqa&Number=56215&Searchpage=1&Main=55958&Words=+Clark&topic=&Search=true#Post56215
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Respected
and maybe they laugh or cry or vomit when a soundbite like that shoots out of the Tee Vee.

Some of the weather dudes we're seeing on the tube live in the cubicle, viewing reality through the compooter, sitting on their sliderules-- maybe some are SO into their statistical ANALisis that they would defend the "onemph" slogan.....

The bit on ABC tonight underlines the manufactured nature of reality via the TV-- courtesy of the companies that have vested interests as noted above......

A gut level human response would tell that warm water feeds hurricanes.

Global Warming feeds warm water.

Scientists study data.

Tee Vee hurls propaganda.

Science was not born to EXPLAIN THINGS AWAY.

Perhaps Reality cannot be sliced and diced so neatly, after all.

Public believes Tee Vee more than gut, respects real science enough to be open-minded, accepts junk science enough to not care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. If the corpbots admit to it being caused by global warming
then the terrorists win. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbajai Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. WEIRD!! CBS News said the same thing tonight!
Why the sudden outright denial of global warming by the major networks? They all but denied ANY role of global warming on CBS News tonight. These networks were previously citing global warming as a HUGE PROBLEM...what is going on?

Why the 180??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. and the other 146mph caused by the giant sucking of the vacumn behind the
eyes of the *moron's diehard supporters.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is the dawning of the Age of....Political Weather. Some scary line
has been crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. and I suppose he also feels that that the increase in sea level ...
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 09:48 PM by Lisa
... makes "no difference" to how far inland the storm surge gets? It's gone up a few inches over the past century, just due to the expansion of warmer water ... and given that the Gulf Coast is subsiding anyway, the USGS, NOAA, and other agencies are taking it seriously. (And yes, even a few inches can make a difference in determining what % of a city gets flooded.)




http://www.climatehotmap.org/impacts/coastalareas.html

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of00-179/

http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.shtml


I bet the "one mile per hour" statistic is based on averages. If there's one thing we've learned about global warming, averages just don't tell the whole story (our assumptions of nice smooth predictable changes spread out over a whole century do not seem to fit real-life climate disruptions).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Thanks to all providing ACTUAL INFO on this subject here
"I bet the "one mile per hour" statistic is based on averages."

--Yep-- I'm sure there's something to back that bumpersticker up with-- including theoretical statistical analysis up the yingyang.

"...averages just don't tell the whole story....."

--and neither do mindless chop-cut soundbites on network news. What an idiotic (fun to DITTOHEAD) statement. My AS IF semi-rant is above.

"(our assumptions of nice smooth predictable changes spread out over a whole century do not seem to fit real-life climate disruptions)."

--The divide b/w assumptions and real life is what inspired the OP

:evilgrin:

This is an opportunity to develop some REAL respect for real life climate disruptions, i.e. Nature, as well as Science, isn't it? The Earth is cutting through the doublethink like no essay, no research and no soapboxing has been able to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. Obviously, this has come from the smartest organism to have ever existed
I wonder what J. Robert Oppenheimer would have said about this.

Smart people know how stupid they are; fools and con-artists make proclamations like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The con-artists count on average people feeling like fools
who think the cons are smarter than them.

This rapid-fire catapult assault lets these idiotic unchallenged assumptions delivered by "experts" enter the mainstream like an infection.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. I think that comes from models that MIT has shown are 700% wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. ABC's 20/20 gave the global warming/hurricane link more serious attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Better that TV give us Valid Points than Talking Points
B-)

Thanksverymuch highplainsdem. I'll check that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Bull puckey
------------------------------------------------------------------
Peace Rally SUPER THREAD:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4870788

Save this nation one town, county, and state at a time:
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. HOW THE HELL DOES HE KNOW THAT ?
The same way they know that * won Florida and Ohio, fuzzy math?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. What a bunch of shills
I read this article this morning. I wonder what gives their particular "expert" the authority to make that statement. No mention of all the experts who believe otherwise. Hmmm....I'm feeling the urge to write to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Article? Where? The National Enquirer?
Edited on Sat Sep-24-05 03:27 PM by omega minimo
:evilgrin:

That's the level of such a chuckle-headed soundbite. Is that how "dumbed down" the American public is, how manipulative the media is and how bogus junk "science" is? :rhetoricalquestion:

Dya hava link? Thanks!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
42. What this asshole SHOULD be discussing is the INSTANT hurricane.
That's what Rita was ... a smallish patch of turbulence in the Carribean that hit the hot gulf waters and BAM! How can this dick even pretend to know that?

And doesn't this rather odd development of Rita set off a few alarms in this guy's noggin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC