Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The link to California's Secretary of State changing election results.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:37 AM
Original message
The link to California's Secretary of State changing election results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. ??????????
they are reporting on the poll results as precincts report in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes.
And it shows you how close this is. Will we wake up to a Davis Governor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How is it close?
With 76% of precincts reporting, there's a 515K, 9-point spread in favor of recall, with Ahnold leading the contenders by 16 points.

California just brought back Pete Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. There's still 24% left to report.
A lot can happen in 24% points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. nothing will happen...
there's only 20% left... and NO would have to win the overwhelming majority of that 20% left in order to get over a 9% lead. Nearly impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He only needs to gain 4%.
Hope. We need hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Oh I am still expecting turns,
but I don't know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YourDad Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. frightening
this is frightening, america is not america anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't think that we're in Kansas anymore Toto.
No, it sure doesn't seem like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Hahahahahaha
Clever. AM I the only one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Does the turnout look unusually low for LA Cty and Alameda?
I just did a mental calcluation--it looks like LA Cty might come about 300K short of what you'd expect (a little over two million). Alameda looks short by 150K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I was wondering about the numbers as well.
The media whores kept talking about the massive turn out, a historic turn out. But I see no evidence of that. If anything, it looks like a poor turn out considering that Davis got 8 million votes last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Davis got about 3.5 million with about 7.5 million voting in 02.
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 04:31 AM by AP
Which is more than either Arnold or the yes vote's getting today, right?

In '98, he got 4.8 mil of about 8.1 million votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Alameda does seem to have a ridiculous turnout, I think it'll turn around.
However, I don't see those 500k or so votes being breached. We lost. It's undeniable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. can someone confirm for me
that the vast majority of the absentee ballots have already been counted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. I wonder if the bulk of provisionals were in LA?
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 04:21 AM by 0rganism
and then there's the Touchscreen Miracle happening in Alameda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Alameda and LA county need huge turnouts.
But it did jump a precentage point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. With 90.4% of precincts reporting...
... the SoS system crashed. It's timing out repeatedly after 1:50 a.m. PDT. At that time, yes on recall was 54.2% and no was 45.8%, with a total of 6,950,000 votes.

California, get used to Governor Ahnold. You wanted him, you got `im.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm really curious about those Alameda and LA Cty votes...but the site
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 04:18 AM by AP
stopped working.

I also want to see if Arnold gets more votes than the No vote gets.



I guess it's bedtime...for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Site cut off?
Site went down for me too. Last report at 1:50 CA Time.

I was watching the numbers in Excel for about an hour. These were last posted


Arnold
3,763,848
54.17%

No Arnold
3,184,259
45.83%

(579,589 vote Dif.)

6,948,107 TOTAL VOTES
90.4% reporting

Tech note--apparently site is not down, just can't get there from my ISP anymore. I was able to get there now via a third party site (Sam Spade).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Update
Site back up at around 2:40. Same results from 1:50 posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. You think we really wanted him? You think this was legitimate?
Curious Pun - I respect your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC