Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid - Go to hell!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:34 PM
Original message
Harry Reid - Go to hell!
This guy was just shilling for Bush's pick. Isn't that the job of people in Bush's party?

Why is our minority leader doing this?

I am not a democrat today. Reid just sealed the deal. I'm voting Green/Independant at every opportunity from now on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. mmmmmmm
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I've got the ice cold Cokes! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bee Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. good call. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
69. I love co'cola!
Now of that Pepsi for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep. Me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. and who did you want bush to nominate. in the best of worlds
so that you could be dem today, who is bush pick suppose to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I expect our leadership to behave like an opposition party!
I want them to behave like an opposition party. That is my issue.

Is that too much to fucking ask for???

Let the republicans do press-conferences praising Bush's picks.

Why the fuck is our minority leader doing it for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Isn't it sweet to see mindless Democrat-bashing?
Wonder how many times some of these folks have "left the party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
68. i have a hard time believing some people are serious getting
these pigs out of office and destroyed as a party. just not good tactical work to get that done, or to get dems to do what we want. i watched how we got boxer jan 6. it was massive emailing. and she says, thinking about it. send more email. and massive email campaign, until she had the courage to do it

attacking and saying they are spineless they say and do nothing, is so nonproductive and will exactly not get what we want. especially those that are standing up time and again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. I'm with you...
Not to mention that if you had to pick a way for pResident Shrimp to shoot himself in the foot, you could hardly do better than this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. i think. and.....i doubt she is a thomas or scalia anyway
this goes with discussion with repug father two nights ago. father sticking up for bush once again. i say he hires people without experience. not good business. fema. roberts. 2 years.

well, this one is going to stick in fathers craw. he is going to think back to me saying, i dont know anything about roberts, only on bench two years. what does it say hiring someone that has never been a judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. It is more than possible
we're going to see Republican Senators fighting AGAINST a Republican nominee in public.

And besides bringing back the FEMA scandal all over again by her very existence, she also brings the Texas Air National Guard (and maybe Harken Energy and the Texas Rangers) back into the spotlight.

I also wonder if she had any ties to Enron...damn few Republicans in Texas didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because he's anti-choice and not a liberal
Reid is a conservative democrat, remember?

He's anti-choice...
He's against gay marriage...

And so on.

If Barbara Boxer comes out supporting Miers, THEN maybe I'll think she's a good candidate.

But, who cares what Harry Reid thinks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. The last time I looked
just because you are pro-life doesn't mean you're anti-choice. Has he specifically said he wants to get rid of Roe V Wade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. Nope, but she has.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #38
82. he voted against supporting Roe v. Wade!!
From wikipedia:

Some consider Harry Reid pro-life, or an opponent of legalized abortion, because of his vote against support of Roe v. Wade in 2004. Reid subsequently refused to answer whether he wants Roe v. Wade overturned. However, Reid proposed that Bush name one of four fervently pro-life Republican senators--Lindsey Graham of South Carolina (who promptly said he wasn't interested), Mike DeWine of Ohio, Mel Martinez of Florida and Mike Crapo of Idaho--to fill the seat on the Supreme Court vacated by Sandra Day O'Connor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
90. Pro-life? Does that mean he wants the US to cease its war in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
63. Barbara Boxer is a tool.
She's a tool for the Democrats to use to reel in the fringe left whenever the party at large seems to go against what the fringe thinks they should do.

Then the fringe can hail her for her "courage," even though such "courage" was entirely orchestrated by the party at large.

She did this during the electoral vote certification because she was just re-elected and had nothing to lose by sticking her neck out. And she did it at the behest of the other Democratic senators, including Reid. She didn't do it on her own any more than the Congressional Black Caucus did.

Some people don't understand political strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #63
83. Boxer
Oh - come on, then. Of course, ALL politicians play politics and strategy. But that doesnt mean that she isn't true to her convictions and doesn't have a pretty good record. I'm not talking about just the electoral vote certification...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #63
89. MY senator - Barbara Boxer - is NOT a tool.
She is a progressive DEM. She stands up when others cannot due to their re-election fears. She KNOWS her position is firm. She is able to yell when others must be 'politically correct'. She is strong. She is confident. She is way together.


DO NOT attempt to paint her into a political corner of cronyism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #63
93. Delete - meant for mods.
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 12:53 AM by alittlelark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #63
94. 2 words - actually, 2 letters: B. S.
B. S. that Boxer is a tool for anyone....

Sorry....that one will never fly....and given that not only is she my Senator, she is a neighbor and someone I've known for years and I can say right now that the day that she is a "tool" for anyone, is the day I know that they replaced her with a clone....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've been saying this all along
In my other threads, the Dem's have no balls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. well, I can respect someone who intends to be evil
but if it's just that he's an idealist and he doesn't know or understand how he was played, then he's an incompetent boob, and that's a lot arder for me to deal with than just outright evil.

Unfortunately it's looking like he's being played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Its temporary.
Give the guy a break. Hes appearing this way to avoid the obvious attacks from the reicht that his mind was made up before he had a chance to look at her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm just sick of the pandering, and the "co-operation"
Maybe I'm naive and childish, but I am just sick to death of democrats going along to get along. It's just one thing after another..none of my interests being represented, mentioned, stood up for. I feel non-existent to the democrats right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
98. It's called being the minority party
Yes it sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_invader Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ok I missed it ,now what did he say? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. He did a press conference with Bush's newest SCOTUS pick.
And basically did the republicans job for them.

Praised her. Handed her the job.

Sold us all out.

You'll be seeing transcripts and video. It was one of the worst moments for our party in quite some time, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_invader Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Just remember Reid is a conservative Dem.
Wait and see what Barbara Boxer has to say IMO she will be one of the best voices on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
61. Oh, I think it was probably a great moment for our party.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:20 PM by janeaustin
Because anyone who has followed Reid's methods and who listened to what he said would have heard him as he:

1. Castrated the right-wingers who have been bleating that we'd oppose (and trash) anyone Bush nominated.

2. Damned her with faint praise. (She's personable and returns her phone calls? Oh, Wow!)

3. Made half the Republican Right oppose her just on the basis of Reid's swift and very weak "endorsement".

4. Laid the groundwork for further weakening a weak Bush, made problems for an already weakened Frist, and provided ammo for blasting a deeper wedge within the republican party.

Stay tuned.



(edited for tense agreement)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. I, for one, won't miss you....
"Why is our minority leader doing this?"
To undercut the Chimp with the right wing.

So she can be sandbagged in the hearings.

Because it pisses off the nutcase right.

To keep the focus on the Chimp and his unqualified nominee instead of whether the Democrats are being "unfair."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. What Reid said is she's qualified--hell, we are ALL qualified for SCOTUS.
Some DUers can't see Reid's rope-a-dope.

Reid is brilliant, even if he's moderate. He's got Bush more than a bit cowed.to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. "hell, we are ALL qualified for SCOTUS."
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 12:58 PM by tx_dem41
Congratulations on being head of a huge state ABA. You've been hiding that from us. :eyes:

Now, can we start actually formulating a plan based on reality and not hyperbole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. So where does it say that only state ABA heads are qualified?
"can we start actually formulating a plan"
Like what? How about supporting the Democratic Party once in a fucking while? That's my plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. After reading your other posts on this thread...
we are in agreement. Surprise! (or shock and disgust, I guess). :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. That's just protocol--it's not official. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. I'll have my friend on the state ABA board nominate you next
time. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Cool! I can't wait for the hearings!
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:09 PM by blondeatlast
The ABA is no more official about this than exactly what Reid did this morning. And endorsement isn't official, notr is it required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. You better not be wearing too many spangly things, have appropriate
eye liner/makeup, and promise that you are married and have kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. All of the above! I can't wait!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Woohoo!
:bounce:

LOL...nice funnin' with you! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Reid knows that some members of the media were fishing
for something they could use to hang the headline "Democrats Oppose Woman for Supreme Court" on...

Some people seem to have no idea what politics is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
70. Like the entire Green party?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Yup...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. See ya then.
Maybe one day you'll lose the naivete and learn about how politics works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
51. If you could pick who Chimpy would nominate that could damge him most
could you have done BETTER than an utterly unqualified crony with ties to a bunch of his old scandals (including his wartime desertion) who would enrage right wing loonies?

Add to that her generally creepy appearance...if I was Harry Reid I'd be dancing in the aisles that she bobbed up into public view.

Let's face it, the only ones Chimpy could have picked that would have been better for the Democrats would be Jack Abramoff or Ahmen Chalabi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #51
95. how is she tied to W's AWOL from TANG?
veddy interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Unlike certain other Dems who will remain nameless...
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 12:50 PM by NightOwwl
Harry Reid is a guy who really knows how to play rope-a-dope. He's not going to knock her down on the first day of her nomination.

This is not his last word on the subject. He's planning something...I'm almost sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'd be willing to bet you were Green before today started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. I just keep thinking how mad the right must be about her getting
on CNN with him...that's good as gold...at least for today. Maybe he is just trying to fan those flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yes...he made sure to mention her contributions to Gore.
He knows exactly what he is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. I actually giggled when he said that!!!
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:02 PM by cry baby
This is a pic of right wingers when they heard him say that::yoiks: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. She contributed to Gore?
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:08 PM by FreedomAngel82
Seriously? Do we know this for sure? Why would Bush nominate someone who gave to Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. The head guy of the Swiftboat Vets (O'neill) donated to Gore too.
People do that. It's known as CYA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Who really cares what Reid says? If this is the thing that would have you
suspend yourself from the Dem party, in all honesty, I have to wonder why you called yourself a Dem in the first place?...:shrug:

There are many battles to be fought, while this may be a big one indeed, there are other things that will keep me fighting the good fight to ensure that D's get elected and we end the neo-con agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
62. It's not THE thing. It's the final straw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. I JUST called his Washington office
He didn't recommend her AT ALL. He has NOT decided to support her as yet.

Call yourself;


202-224-3542
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. How're things at Green Underground?
Home of disillusioned DUers--all 5 of them.

See ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ok all you political gurus. What EXACTLY is the strategy here.
Some of you seem to think there is some great strategy at play here.

What it is?

Every single time the democrats do something like this, people like you come out and claim some "grand strategy" they are supposedly working with.

There is no strategy here.

She'll get the job, and we'll be left wondering what exactly the "grand strategy" was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. "people like you come out and claim some "grand strategy" they are ...
supposedly working with."


And people like you keep saying they're leaving the party and then keep sticking around bashing Democrats at the drop of a hat.

Please, go to GU and stay naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. She'll get the spot, and Reid will look weak for backing her.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:05 PM by Beelzebud
Have fun with that strategery.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Only if you promise...really promise
to join GU (or at least start it up).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. LOL Only when you start Democratic Mainstream, okay?
Look, I see your point. I just don't think it is going to work.

She is going to be sitting on the supreme court, and Reid is going to be the democratic minority leader that enodorsed her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Try this thread....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
85. Great example! Multiple requests for the mavens to reveal the Grand
Strategy there, too!

In fact, 4 or 5 of those requests were mine... sadly, other than being told that I'm probably not a good chess or poker player, I never received an answer. Nor, from my reading, did anybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. He endorsed MY MOM for the SCOTUS. Probably yours, too.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:08 PM by blondeatlast
Think about it for a while--I feel certain you will get it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. If everyone knew the strategy (if there is one), there would be no
strategery in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. I back Reid.
As a liberal I do not agree with everything he says and does, but I back him just like I do with every Democrat CongressCritter. It's called party unity and it is an absolute requisite for any party to win.

Do I dislike this SCOTUS nominee? I don't know that yet. But I cannot imagine Chimpy nominating anybody to SCOTUS who I would like. Maybe Reid knows something we don't yet know. I'm willing to listen to him and see how this plays out. He may have a very good reason to do what he's doing. Let's wait and see before we throw Reid off the train, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
84. why back him?
Why back him for the sake of unity?

He'd be perfectly FINE with an anti-choice nominee!! THat's not one of the standards that he uses!!

So, in order to trust someone's opinion on a candidate - well, we have to have the same standards. I woudlnt trust Joe Lieberman saying that she's an "okay" candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #84
88. Because his strategy this morning is working.
That's why. It was a shrewd move on his part. He doesn't like Miers anymore than you do. But he's playing a jiu-jitsu game with the Repugs. His words this morning were notably timid. He condemned with faint praise. The wackos immediately responded by complaining about Miers.

Reid is smart. He did something very cool. Notice that he did not say he would support her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Calm down....
Give him a break! This is his first response. We know nothing about her. It would be foolish to immediately start ranting. Give him a while...and then you can beat the sh!t out of him.

There is an up side. Bush's base is already going nuts over this selection. Seeing Reid practically endorse her (and he mentioned she gave money to Gore) will make their heads explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
66. Especially the money to Gore!
I wonder why he (Bush) is nominating her. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. O'neill (swiftvets) gave to Gore too. It's called CYA.
Political operatives do this all the time, for this very purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneNation Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
79. Calm down indeed.
This is just a opening move in chess game. Reid might be hoping that Bush's base shoots down this nomination. The right wing rank and file is up in arms over Miers so that's not such outlandish idea as it might first appear.

If the right wing is the reason that Miers nomination fails, then old Harry Ried can just sit back with a grin on face and comment on the extremism of the Republican party. This might be the only winning strategy the senate Democrats have since they are in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
87. Gore was once anti-abortion!! - that's why she donated!
From WIKIPEDIA

"Though Gore has gradually moved politically further left; he was once a moderate-to-conservative lawmaker. Early in his career, he was pro-life; his Congressional voting record was rated by the National Right to Life Committee as 84% anti-abortion. Through the late 1980s, Gore maintained that abortion destroyed innocent human life. He had adopted a pro-choice position by 1988, when he sought the Democratic presidential nomination. Conservatives have criticized his change as stemming from political expedience rather than conviction."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. The fight hasn't even begun, and you're accusing D's of caving.
Reid is just going through the usual civilty crap. What sort of a nominee did you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. As pRetzeldent George W. Bush says:
"When in panic, fear, or doubt,
Run in circles, scream and shout!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Pawn Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
53. Well, good luck enabling the Republicans.
Why don't you just write-in vote yourself for every post?

He's doing it because he's smart. You have no credibility if you start by bashing her character--and we know nothing of anything but her character. First compliment her character. Then tear her to pieces with her unqualification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. Go right ahead and do it.
You and Mike Malloy are doing the Republicans' work for them, since fringe parties will NEVER gain any power in this country.

The Republicans are laughing at nonsense like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Actually It was Harry Reid doing their work for them today.
Sorry for wanting a party that doesn't do the opposition's work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #60
76. What's he supposed to do?
Before the Roberts' nomination Reid basically said Miers would make a great justice, perhaps not ever dreaming that Bush would actually nominae her. Now that she is the nominee what exactly is Reid supposed to do to backtrack? Say "Oops, I did it again?" and ask for Owen or Brown instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
59. and last week he was a hero for voting against Roberts
It's always hot and cold on DU, one week your up and one week your down depending on your latest vote. How stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfrrfrrfr Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
64. The Democrats are


Poised to achieve ultimate victory over their GOP majority oppressers. 7 Unfit Circuit Judges to preserve the filibuster for the supreme court nominee/s and 2 unfit Supreme Court justices. Go Go Dems.

Way to draw a line in the sand and then... err erase it when the rethugs look mean at them. Where are all the we need to save the filibuster for the Supreme court so lets let these sucky nominees, who have no business being on the court in the first place, onto the circuit court people who praised the "Compromise"?

Oh thats right most of them were silent on the Roberts nomination and seem to be practically giddy on Miers.

The nomination of these justices to the circuit courts and the Supreme Court are a blow to our constitutional rights and protections that we won't be able to fix for Generations. Many of us will be dead or in our dotage before we can replace them.

How anyone can call that a victory is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
75. Then quit hanging around here and wasting our time with this BS, leech.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 04:25 PM by LoZoccolo
Go away; you're freeloading off of DU as of now with this attention whoring so get out of here.

P.S. A conservative somewhere has just said to you:

"You do that moonbat, all of you be sure to VOTE GREEN forever!"

I wouldn't be too proud of conservatives encouraging me that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
77. Goodbye,
and good riddance! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
78. Alright, Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my closeup!


Don't you just love these dramatic exit threads?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. Oh no you di'nt!!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Just couldn't resist.
Dramatic exits always make me think of dear old Norma. Nobody could do it like she could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
86. Seeya! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
91. Msnbc and Newsweek are speculating that she is pro-choice
and to top it off, she is a woman.

The righties are pissed about this pick.

So maybe, just maybe, Reid knows something that we don't.

CAN we pleeeeze give the minority leader the benefit of the doubt?!

I have been happy with Reid so far, and I am willing to be open to hear what he has to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
92. The way I see it is
and most will disagree is, at some point I need to trust the fact that they are in the midst of what is going on and have a better chance of knowing the reality of things. Second guessing ever one of the decisions isn't helping me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
96. Great!
Maybe in 08' you and your fellow Greenies can muster up votes from 3% of the general population and beat your record in 00'! Woo woo! Then when the Democrats lose and Republicans remain in power please OH PLEASE continue to bitch about Democrats nonstop! We need more dumbass petty arguments like these on DU.

:sarcasm: btw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
97. I liked the way he phrased it....
"We're very happy he nominated somebody like her."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
99. Locking
"You are not permitted to use this message board to work for the defeat of the Democratic Party nominee for any political office."

"Democratic Underground may not be used for political, partisan, or advocacy activity by supporters of any political party or candidate other than the Democratic party or Democratic candidates."

"Do not post broad-brush smears against Democrats or the Democratic Party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC