Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers being single doesn't match the image requirement for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:04 PM
Original message
Miers being single doesn't match the image requirement for
"Conservatives" there's not a nice family picture for them with her.

My apologies to anyone offended by my previous post on Miers. My comment about her being single was not meant as an automatic link to her sexuality. I could care less. The point I was trying to make is that she doesn't fit the "Conservative" mold. I don't know if she's gay, or a lesbian, or a spinster, or divorced...hell, beats me.

What I do know, like it or not, in politics image matters. In politics, people look at how things look and family matters...especially to the "Conservatives." Now I don't care about these phony "conservatives" or what they think. I don't respect their values or their views. I am simply stating a fact that the pretty picture factor counts.

I don't mean any disrespect to single women, or lesbian women, or any other women. I just think that, like it or not, there is an image factor in the public arena. You know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. She should be in the kitchen stirring a pot and ....
ironing her husband's shirts with the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's stupid requirement
What's the problem with someone not being married? Conservatives have a serious case of not minding their own business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course it's "stupid", it's a CONSERVATIVE requirement. Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Exactly! It is stupid but it is their standard. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Condi Rice?
I have not heard too much about her status from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Miers and Condi Rice are both secretly
married to W. That's why he needs those long vacations. He probably has more wives than Rev. Moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Plus she is a woman.
Woman have a designated role in the puke world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. maybe her and condi can hook up?
think of the repug heads exploding:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. She could be serving Bush the same way Condi is
Her husb...the President, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC