Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've never been to New York, but wouldn't Sunday be a stupid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:24 AM
Original message
I've never been to New York, but wouldn't Sunday be a stupid
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 AM by rzemanfl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, the subways are far more crowded during the week.
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:31 AM by Maraya1969
The terrorism alert does not sound very feasible if it is planned for a Sunday.

It is kind of like saying the terrorists were planning on blowing up a subway at 2am on a Tuesday night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, it sounds really stupid to me too. Although I am inclined to
believe the whole thing was pretty much a fabrication, maybe started by some detainee who didn't know Sunday was not a work day here making up a story and BushCo then using it as a distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe the entire episode was a case of "Don't look at the man behind
the curtain"...for both Bush and Bloomberg. It was an opportunity for both of them to try to distract the public from issues that they should have been concentrating on.
I hope it did not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. For the sake of argument, say I was a terrorist...
now, say I was now a target of the war on terror, and was suspicious of my communication channels or lower ranking personnel. How would I check my security?

Well, to me it seems pretty obvious - come up with a series of phony plots that I do not intend to carry out then channel by channel, person by person test each by transmitting a phony plot to them.

It would take time, and each plot would have to be something that would cause a visible reaction from the authorities.

So say Muhammad just joined my group in the last few months - I tell him he is going to coordinate a plot to bomb the subway in NY, and then tell him to coordinate with trusted members.

If the plot is revealed - detectable by the increased security or media reports about it - then I know Muhammad is a plant or talked to a plant. If it is not revealed I simply call off the mission saying other plans have instead been made.

How many of these plots we hear about in the press are such tests? Do you think we would ever be told if the person who informed the US about the plot wound up dead? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ucmike Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. the bomber would be able to get a seat on sunday.
so that might make it more appealing to them. no reason to stand and blow yourself to bits, when you can sit and blow yourself to bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC