Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arianna Huffington......A must read!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 11:52 AM
Original message
Arianna Huffington......A must read!
Edited on Wed Jul-16-03 01:38 PM by Skinner
Bush's Mis-State-Ment Of The Union Fiasco

By Arianna Huffington

Poor Karl Rove. He spends close to two years meticulously staging photo
ops and carefully crafting sound bites to create the image of President
Bush as a take-charge, man-the-controls,
land-the-jet-on-the-deck-of-the-aircraft carrier, "Bring 'em on" kind of
leader. But now the latest revelations about the Misstatement of the Union
fiasco are threatening to bring back the old notion of W as a bumbling,
detached figurehead-in-chief.

And it's the president's own people who are painting this unflattering
portrait.

Take George Tenet: While robotically impaling himself on his sword, the
CIA director took great pains to point out that he thought so little of
the Niger/Saddam uranium connection that he and his deputies refused to
bring it up in congressional briefings as far back as fall 2002. It just
didn't meet his standards.

Same with Colin Powell. The Secretary went on at great length about the
intense vetting process -- "four days and three nights" locked up with the
leaders of the CIA, working "until midnight, 1 o'clock every morning,"
going over "every single thing we knew about all of the various issues
with respect to weapons of mass destruction" -- that went into deciding
what information would be used in his United Nations presentation. A
presentation that ultimately did not include the Niger allegation because
it was not, in Powell's words "standing the test of time."

Hmmm, just how hard is that test? Powell's UN speech came a mere eight
days after Bush's State of the Union -- leaving one to wonder what the
expiration date is on patently phony data? About a week after a president
uses it, it turns out.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is REALLY damaging.
>"As the Niger controversy -- Yellowcake-gate -- is turning into a political firestorm, the question should be: What didn't the president know -- and why didn't he know it? And why does he know less and less every day?">

this has the potential of alerting the American voters to the fact that they elected an empty suite to the office to be filled by people they wouldn't have voted for or supported EVER.

Wow!

This is some heavy stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Keep plugging, Arianna!
Maybe someone will listen to you one day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, but..
You would really just do a clip of the article and provide a link to the rest. You know, to keep out of copyright troubles and so forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sushi_lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Atlanta Journal sometimes carries her columns
I hope they pick up this one.

I even liked the line about Clinton being a world-class weasel. It's a nice pre-emption to the "Yeah but Clinton lied" defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. WOW!!!
Especially the last 5 paragraphs!
You shouldn't have pasted the whole thing, but thank you. If the thread gets locked, repost using snips... especially the concluding ones.

Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ianbruce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Link to Arianna's article:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Thanks for the link, ianbruce, this article kicks ass.
A must read, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm so glad that Arianna saw the light
She's worth 500 Dennis Millers! I also love to see her on shows-she is well-spoken and quick with an answer. She also has that great accent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. buff2
Per DU copyright rules
please post only 4
paragraphs from
the news source.


Thank you.


NYer99
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unreal thread
Kudos

drip drip pour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. "the imminent threat that wasn't" !!!!! Yes Arianna, tell it like it is.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. War crimes trials are necessary
Bush may not recognize the ICC, but the point would be moot if he and his fellow thugs are tried for war crimes in US courts.

Bush decided to go to war and his people cherry picked the intelligence data to sell it as a product. Remember, that's what Andy Card called it. No one cared whether the reasons publicly given to justify the war were factual. In fact, most of them were not. As long as no one cared whether the data itself could be verified, why should anyone be concerned about the authenticity of the exhibits to support it? They didn't care whether the Niger document was a fake.

If going to war and presenting the American people and the UN Security Council fabricated evidence to justify it isn't a crime against the peace, what is?

Impeachment doesn't go far enough. Neither does simply defeating him in the next election. These people must be sent to prison. As a nation, we must reassure the world that this will not happen again. It is absolutely necessary that the junta's leaders be tried for war crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. JR...
A continuation from a locked thread...

I agree with a War Crimes Trial. I said that in my post. My point though was that impeachment now, without control of either house, would be moot and a waste of ammo. Defeating him in a real election is the FIRST step TO "sending him to prison". After that they'll get what they deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I am going to argue for impeachment
Even if the Republicans control Congress and aren't likely to vote for it, it's the right thing to do. We cannot allow Bush to continue in office now. We cannot allow any of his aides to continue, either.

We should demand impeachment. If the Republicans refuse for purely partisan reasons, let them pay the price for it. Do you remember what happened to those who waited for the last minute to distance themselves from Nixon?

In any case, as Arianna says, this is much worse than Watergate. And that's saying a mouthfull. Watergate was an attack on our system of free elections (something else the junta is apt to do -- that's why we call it the junta). However, this was a betrayal of trust involving war. How dare they be so cavalier with the truth when sending young Americans into combat? Some of my two sons' friends are signing up for service. I've known these kids since some of them were in kindergarten. They can get killed over these lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. *APPLAUSE*!!!!!! YES!
I'm with you, Jack Rabbit. No time like the present to show the American people just exactly what these vicious little oil tycoons really are.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC