Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone wonder if Mieirs is a "first pick" ploy to help a "second pick"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:04 PM
Original message
Anyone wonder if Mieirs is a "first pick" ploy to help a "second pick"?
Perhaps Bushco realized that the Dems weren't going to let another nomination of us go through without a big fight and scrutiny, and that his base would be adamant about a rw thug that the Dems wouldn't allow, perhaps he put on Mieirs KNOWING that she was going to pull herself out of contention at some point after they've gone through some pain the first week or two of looking at her.

Perhaps he feels that if the Dems feel that they "win" in keeping her from getting confirmed, they'll be less apt to try and nix a subsequent nomination from him that perhaps will be the person he and Rove really want to be on the court. Or at least they'll feel that the public will have been "placated" into thinking that the Dems fought "enough"... That would certainly be something that's Rove's style!

If that's the case and she does pull out, we have to NOT LET UP in scrutinizing Bush's replacement pick! Might even be more dangerous than either Roberts or Mieirs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pattim Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...Why?
The Democrats are offering no resistance, and in fact are actually *defending* her against the right-wing attacks. Seriously, everyone knows the attacks are coming from the right. They've split the party. They've angered the base. And Bush has *never* angered his base on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. If so, a major screwup for the Bush team.
What's that, a bazillion in a row?

But it sure blew up in his face. We're not having to fight it at all. We can quietly agree with people like George Will that Miers is pathetically unqualified for a position on the U.S. Supreme Court and then watch and enjoy while half of the right rips the other half a new one. It's also useful to know which usual suspects value their loyalty to GWB more than their ideology, and vice-versa.

But your point is still valid. Let's not laugh so hard over this .38 to the foot that we relax our guard for the next nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slybacon9 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. been thinking that everyday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is like free tix to the circus - RW beating themselves to a pulp
Oooooh, I'm so stuffed on popcorn I think I'll bust before the show is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. yep, approximately one minute after she was announced
but it was a strategic blunder nonetheless.

BushCo was expecting some fake division to stoke us dems into a shameful display of partisanship, but they failed to anticipate that it would become very real division in their own ranks.

All I can do is laugh at those maroons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thought it from the go
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dubya isn't that smart. He thought this was going to help him.
This had to be all Bush. He picked her because she kisses his ass, and he thinks that means she's smart.


He's stupid, this stupid ...
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think this has a Rove smell to it!
Dubya's not been making these sorts of decisions up there and we know it... You can bet he had others to pick Roberts for him. Rumor was that Roberts was Rehnquist's personal choice to succeed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I worried about that until I realized that her nomination was just the
usual B* cronyism. Pick anyone who will CYA (CTA'a) (CYA cover your ass...CTA cover their arses). From what I understand, Meirs knows about B* I selling the weapons to Saddam H. in the first place, and his attempts to turn SH into Hitler personified prior to the Gulf War. Meirs could and likely would keep all of the BFEE's nasty little secrets quiet.

Now I'm worried that she will drop out, and we'll really get a nightmare. To be perfectly honest though, I care about many other issues than the overturning of Roe vs. Wade. I don't think it will happen. The only friend I have that has had an abortion years ago, is a Republican. Not for religious reasons, but purely for self-interest (read tax cuts for the wealthy.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yup.
Word is it was all a set up and Viet Dinh is the next nominee.

What I hear, anyways......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC