LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:37 PM
Original message |
Biden just stated Hillary was the overwhelming pick |
|
for 08. Did anyone else hear him on "Hardball"? Why, why is the DLCc's wonder child first pick?
I can't make myself back her. Oh no...
|
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I guess he's not running anymore? n/t |
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Biden said he'd run but thought Hillary was the front runner. nt |
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. My repub faux-watching mother informed me that |
|
the new show "Commander in Chief" means that Hillary will run.
:wtf:
Is this what they are spouting over there?
I informed her that I do not want Hillary to run.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm not a praying person... |
|
...but I PRAY I don't have to vote for Hillary.
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't know why they are pushing '08 so hard unless they |
|
have no faith in '06. One election at a time.
And no, this is not a Hillary Bashing thread.
I just want to point out that '06 is now one year away. Get on the stick boys. '08 will follow in 2 years after '06.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. You're right 06 is the year to focus on who knows |
|
what will come after the 06 elections.
|
Neil Lisst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. He said she has to be considered the favorite. |
|
He didn't say she would win.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I feel disheartened though |
|
Who knows who will win. I thought it interesting that he made that statement.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
7. John Edwards would get the nomination over Hillary, I think. |
|
He'd have wider appeal than she does.
|
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He does not have a choice - he knows he is not the favorite |
|
If he said she was not, he would have to speak about other potential favorites and this is not good for him.
Better say she is the favorite and then position himself as the anti-Hillary.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Another disgusting shameless bid for VP |
|
and attempt to marginalize anyone else 3 years before the election. Ridiculous.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
Hillary would have to go south for a running mate. Probably someone like Wes Clark. That is if she runs and if she is nominated.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
22. Wes Clark would be a wise move for her VP. (n/t) |
Poiuyt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Means nothing. Remember how Howard Dean was the can't miss candidate? |
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
You have a good point. I was going downhill fast you put me back on track. Thanks
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
23. Dean was a classic case of "easy come, easy go". Hillary's been around |
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Screw Joe & Hil & the whores they rode in on. Last time I checked |
|
the Reeps pick the Republican candidate. Why would the Dems field one, too?
|
Hardrada
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
17. We don't want here because she is a sell-out |
|
and follows the AEI agenda. Need some untainted person.
|
Hardrada
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Who cares what Bidet thinks? |
Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Dean on Letterman last week said 11 people are running! |
|
I haven't counted on my fingers....but I know I did a double take. I hope he's kidding. We're supposed to do it smart this time....
|
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
20. That is not for Biden to decide |
|
That should be up to the voters to decide. Biden, and many others in the DLC are too full of themselves.
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I'm sure that's the DLC talking points! |
lovelaureng
(434 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
24. I can't back her either. |
|
Let us hope that the Democrats can do better than that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |