Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Check this out -- we're in some serious debt!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 12:33 AM
Original message
Check this out -- we're in some serious debt!
US gross external debt more than $6 trillion-Trsy
Wednesday October 8, 7:40 pm ET

WASHINGTON, Oct 8 (Reuters) - U.S. debt owed to foreign governments, central banks, private banks and other investors topped $6 trillion in the quarter ended June 30, the Treasury Department said on Wednesday.


Of that, about $1.270 trillion in principal and another $53.73 billion in interest is due within the next 3 months, according to a new report on the U.S. external debt position issued by Treasury.

<snip>
The report shows the extent to which the United States remains dependent on foreign investment. Even for an economy totaling $10.803 trillion annually, the $6.357 trillion in external debt is a hefty 58.8 percent of gross domestic product.

By comparison, the U.S. government takes in about $2 trillion annually in taxes and fees, and the anticipated 2003 budget gap of around $400 billion would be about 3.7 percent of the overall economy.

<snip>
The report can be found at http://www.treas.gov/tic/external-debt.html.

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/031008/economy_treasury_debt_1.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Howard Deans statement on this subject :
CONCORD, NH-Yesterday in an interview with Bloomberg News,
Comptroller General David M. Walker, head of the General Accounting
Office, disputed as "flat false" President Bush's assertion that
economic growth resulting from tax cuts will help shrink the federal
deficit.
Governor Dean issued the following:

"When the federal government's own chief auditor can't trust the
President's rosy scenario budget projections, something is wrong in
America. The truth is, these tax cuts were never meant to reduce
the deficit; they are part of a radical ideological agenda aimed at
starving the federal budget in order to force cuts in vital services
like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and public education.

"I'm tired of being misled by this administration. The President
should be honest about what the future of America will look like due
to his policies: it is an America where those at the top are
protected, those in the middle class must struggle to stay there,
and our seniors, our children and our low-income families will be
expected to fend for themselves. President Bush should level with
the people and let them decide if that's the America they want,
since that's the America they're getting.

"David Walker should be commended for saying what so many of us in
both parties have long argued: the supply-side theory that cutting
taxes will ultimately reduce deficits is a myth."

RIGHT ON HOWARD!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. preach on brother Howard
the word "looting" is too goddamn generous to describe what these devils are doing

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Pulls no punches......
He'd make a great President....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JewelDigger Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. We are in DEEP doo-doo......
....seriously, we are!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. keep your eye on the $145 billion ball
The California pension fund has $145 Billion in assets. That's a lot of money, folks. Even in big money parlance, that is a lot.

CalPERS will be a juicy target for Pawnold and his friends. Just like UTIMCO (permanent university fund in Texas) was for George W. and his buddies. Just like the Florida pension fund (JEB was one of three on the oversight board) inexplicably lost over a hundred million dollars buying Enron stock as it plummeted in near freefall.

Yeah, looting doesn't begin to cover what's going on.

The government is broke so the response is, we fight wars for no reason, and give the rich money in tax cuts that the rest of us will have to pay back with interest, because it's borrowed money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbutsz Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. And that's just what's on paper..
What's the chance of us ever actually defaulting, considering that we're dependent on foreign investment according to this? Isn't much of foreign investment in the states is leaving now, or at least posturing to leave? What is left here to invest in?

With every economic report I read here lately I see a viscious pattern/cycle that spells economic ruin ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That is the nightmare.
No one really knows what would happen with a default. Or what the real chances are.

Since most federal bills are now paid with debt, not cash from tax and fee income, cashing those checks depends on selling new debt. Retiring old debt is paid with new debt.

If new debt isn't forthcoming, the only way the checks could clear would be to actually issue new money. Essentially, they would be firing up the presses to print more cash. This would not be good.

It would be very, very, bad.

I mean so bad you can't imagine how bad.

US dollars would be worthless, so we couldn't buy oil, BMW's, all that Chinese stuff in Wal-Mart, or anything else. It could take the rest of the world down with us.

You might be OK if you had a lot of gold. Or might not be.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbutsz Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Argentina: Episode II? :-O
Production and industry has been and is increasingly being shipped offshore to India, China, etc. In the event of a crash we won't have the ability to support ourselves for while. The only thing that pulled us out of the first depression was massive spending into the infrastructure (creating JOBS), massive spending we won't have the ability to do this time around because we have no capital and will no longer have ANY credit. Something tells me this might actually be the intention of the lunatics in power (political as well as corporate), to devolve America back down to cheap labor and plutocracy... Kind of like "resetting" the American Dream from square one.... or, The Matrix Reloaded..heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Actually,,,
the prevailing opinion is that all tha pump-priming going on back then helped, but would have taken forever to drag us out of the Depression.

Other stuff like Europe being at war, the drought, a lack of fully understanding monetary policy, etc. helped to hold us down.

Most people seem to agree that it was the massive amount of spending on the war that got us out of trouble. And that spending was fueled by debt.

Of course, we've become so addicted to debt for basic operations now that issuing a bunch of War Bonds would just be a drop in the bucket.

I think we're doomed.

But, I'm a depressed pessimist, so what do I know.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's a debt that can NEVER be repaid; based upon an oil economy....
that projects endless growth. The economy cannot possibly grow endlessly when the primary physical input, petroleum, is a diminishing resource.

We will default. That or we will devalue the dollar so much that it means the same thing. It is physically impossible for the economy to continue with the current energy usage regime. There is insufficient investment to replace the current regime with any feasible alternative. Repayment of the debt demands a growing economy.

Google: dieoff.com or oilcrash or peak oil for more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. welcome my people
to the bush crime cyndicate's ultimate goal 100% privitation of goverment, can you say Omni Consumer Products (watch robocop 1-3 sometime)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. Social Security has ended? - Internal Debt to SS not worth reporting?
Guess when folks say theft of the payroll tax to fund tax cuts for the rich, they had it right.

Funny how the media does not report the implication of Bush beginning "external Debt reporting" - with no National Debt reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC