hedda_foil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:01 PM
Original message |
Judy Whoredruff and Candy Crowley spinnig debate now! CNN |
arcane1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. that reminds me, I wanted to email her about that shameful farce |
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I don't need to see that |
|
It is as predictable and obvious as so much else in Imperial America.
Don't you wish we still lived in the Old Republic, where things could still surprise you sometimes (as the raucous parade of a Free Nation is wont to do).
Imperial Amerika is as boringly predictable (so far, anyway) as Stalinist Russia.
Everyone who is watching knows what the Empire is going to do long before it happens these days.\
For instance:
I can say with 100% certainty:
The Busheviks will never catch the Right-Wing Anthrax Assassin The Busheviks will never catch the Plame Leaker Imperial Amerika will NEVER have a forward-looking space program nor will we ever set foot on Mars or have a moonbase (the Busheviks will spend it all on militarizing Earth orbit)
There's more, much more, as boringly predictable as if you'd said,
"I am 100% certain Stalin will never release the poltical prisoners from the Gulags, nor even admit they exist."
Same thing.
Luckily, the Busheviks are for the moment "kinder and gentler" than the Totalitarians (left and right) who have come before them.
|
MidwestTransplant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Enquiring minds and all that stuff!
|
barbaraann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They've gone beyond whoredom. They are operatives now. |
|
They don't even bother to hide what they are doing.
|
Lars39
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. *snork* No, no-----she 's an analyst!!! |
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Which one was more annoying? |
|
Judy Woodruff seemed determined to destroy any show of unity the Democrats had. Then I suppose she will whine about the "splintered message."
Candy Crowley was also terrible - setting up ridiculous scenarios and hypotheticals to preface her questions. What was that all about? She asked someone, Kerry, something that assumed a nuclear attack! I don't know if she has a crush on Bush or if she is in ill health or just scared senseless about something, but she looked really stressed and unhappy and just projected sheer hatred towards the candidates.
Judy Woodruff looked tight-lipped and furious. Did they not want to be there? Why were they so angry?
|
barbaraann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I think Candy is miffed because Arnold didn't grope her. |
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Would he know where to begin?
|
barbaraann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. He allegedly spanked some of his victims. |
hatrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Video Ipecac. Great! n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |