Fuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:54 AM
Original message |
Did you catch Kay Bailey Hutchison's Freudian slip on MTP? |
|
Russert: Sen Hutchinson, do you think there is a possibility that the White House may pull Harriet Miers nomination?
Hutchison: No I do not Tim. I think they have complete faith in her as I do, I know her, they know her. She is totally qualified for the Supreme Court of the United States. Her legal background, her absolute leadership in the legal field when she was a practicing lawyer, uh are UNQUALIFIED.
:hippie:
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's okay to be a trial lawyer |
|
when you're a republican
fucking idiots
|
Neil Lisst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
18. She has never been a trial lawyer. She couldn't find .... |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 12:49 PM by Neil Lisst
She couldn't find the courthouse without a map. When she did show up, someone else did the courtroom work. She was there for show only.
Just pointing out that she's not even a trial lawyer.
She was a lawyer who got business from big business, a rain maker.
|
grannylib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
2. hee hee, that's great! I'm sure she was planning to say something |
|
ridiculous like "unparallelled" or whatever but inadvertently spoke the truth. Bet they HATE it when that happens!
|
liveoaktx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
brucefan
(421 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Sounds right to me. n/t |
rfranklin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I wondered who that old bag was..have you noticed that everyone on... |
|
those talk shows this morning is about 90 years old? Is there no one under 70 that they can find? These people are proff that age does not confer wisdom.
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
14. Dang. I was in college with Kay Bailey (now Hutchison) |
|
We were also camp counselors together.
Guess I'll just go back to bed and stay out of everybody's way since I'm so old.
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 12:49 PM by devilgrrl
oops delete
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
20. Wasn't she a news reporter at one time? |
|
During the campaign '04 'Frontline' did an episode about Kerry and Bush. There was a shot a bus or plane covering whatever George HW Bush was campaigning for and I swear the correspondent was Kay Bailey Hutchinson. That was a rather eye opening moment! It certainly put her in a whole new light where I'm concerned. I couldn't stand her from the get go but after finding out that she's been a Bush whore since the '70's makes her presence that much worse. Ultimately what is appalling is that her background and connection with the BFEE is rarely a topic of discussion.
|
yankeedem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
5. She also said that perjury and obstruction of justice aren't real crimes |
|
Russert, bless his heart, threw the Clinton charges in her face. Make KBH look like the fool she is.
|
countingbluecars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
She hopes that they don't come up with something minor like perjury and obstruction just to justify two years of investigation. Not quite her words but close.
|
Mira
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
6. So sorry, had my fingers in my ears - yelling "I can't hear you" N/T |
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I have managed to just block her out without my fingers in my ears. |
|
I see her lips move but refuse to register what she has to say.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Rumor was the other senators once voted her |
|
Least Likely to Become Rocket Scientist.
|
ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
watching it with Melodie and remarked on it to her: "I think she meant 'unsurpassed' . . . then again . . . "
|
bluedawg12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Love her use of words: |
|
Hutchison: No I do not Tim. I think they have complete faith in her as I do, I know her, they know her. She is totally qualified for the Supreme Court of the United States. Her legal background, her absolute leadership in the legal field when she was a practicing lawyer, uh are UNQUALIFIED.
..........
complete faith in her totally qualified absolute leadership
.......
Kay's prayer:
Hail Harry(ette) full of grace, our complete faith is with thee. Totally qualified are thee in all the right places. Blessed is your absolute leadership. And blessed is the fruit of thy background: Georgus. Holy Harry above the law pray for our choices now and at time of SCOTUS votes. Amen.
|
LoKnLoD
(923 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Is every politician from Texas |
|
either a crook or a dumbass?
|
snippy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. No. Many are both. n/t |
Metta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-23-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Poor baby. She's such a lying shill.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message |