|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:51 PM Original message |
Why the "They didn't know Plame was undercover" spin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. They did know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. If excuse A didn't fly, try excuse B, and so on, and so on, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KerryOn (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Just like the reasons for going to war.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. If they DID NOT KNOW, then they are INCOMPETENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nookiemonster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Brewster is the big fish and the RW won't mention it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unschooler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. By the "big fish," you mean Brewster was the real target of the outing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nookiemonster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yes, that's exactly what I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unschooler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Seems very viable to me. I've always thought that "outing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. There are many who share this point of view. Brewster -Jennings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I think even Fitzpatric and grand jury see it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nookiemonster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Alright, perhaps I'm having a moment of clarity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:04 AM Response to Reply #7 |
29. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. I've been trying to make this point in a few threads tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Outing Plame outs Brewster-Jennings & Associates, regardless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Don't get me wrong, I totally agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Yep. If they were calculating the age of the twins, they KNEW she was NOC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Not exactly. If they were 4 1/2 yrs old + 9 mos pregnancy - that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. But that's my point. Suppose Plame were no longer a NOC, BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nookiemonster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Damn. That's pretty critical thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. The papers on Air Force 1 ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niallmac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. Real evil poisonous snakes. They hold nothing sacred. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. Fitz is going for the throat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
14. What a load of crapola. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tulsakatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. I believe that Fitzgerald may now be going after the bigger charges..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Novak published a few "why, EVERYONE knew Plame was CIA" columns... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
18. Astounding claim!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
21. They want to spin away from the cover up WHY LIE??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Cover up and perjury are bad. Causing CIA agents to die... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
28. They are trying to make it out to be an "oops, didn't mean to" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
30. "WINPAC" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:16 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. That's what Miller said? Or is that what Libby said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LunaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
31. If they were so "innocent", then why the cover-up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC