|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:38 AM Original message |
Rove still in "significant danger" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wookie294 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. This bothers me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I think he felt sorry for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. nonsence..no fed prosecutor feels sorry for anyone..they simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Fitzgerald indicted former Gov. George Ryan when he was 69 years old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Because he can put Libby away for 30 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. I don't think it is refused. Don't turn on Fitz yet. HE didn't because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wookie294 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The article says Fitz "had amassed considerable evidence" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. could not prove Libby's "intent" because Libby lied lied lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 11:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. bcz then he couldn't use Libby as leverage any more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. I take heart in the fact that Fitz started w/one indictment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:11 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. 1 indictment -> 66? Inspiring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. I'm with you babylonsister! once again waiting and watching. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frustratedlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. Why couldn't Cheney be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I think Rove's lawyer fessed up that Rove was Official A. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frustratedlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:56 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thanks! I missed that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. Personally, I think Rove is toast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kstewart33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
12. Fitz wanted an airtight case, and he got one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. yes and rereading the indictment, Libby cannot get out of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
18. I quit worrying about the indictments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC