Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why doesn't Hannity talk about the hunter who started one of the CA fires?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:33 PM
Original message
Why doesn't Hannity talk about the hunter who started one of the CA fires?
I guess people aren't responsible for anything. It all the fault of the trees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same reason he doesn't blame Bill Owens for Colorados fires.
He's a completely biased asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Guns don't kill people. Trees don't kill people.
Loaded hunters kill people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh no, he said the people that are responsible are the Democrats
because conservationists don't want the trees thinned so that Georgie can give out logging contracts. Hannity said that all the conservationists are Democrats.So because the forests weren't clearcut, that was why there were fires and the Democrats were responsible. I kid you not, I heard that on his radio show Mon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right - Let's check with the NRA to see...
if that asshole is a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. You mean you don't know??

The hunter was shooting at Clinton, who was supposed to be standing by the big tree. Clinton, however, lied and moved to the little tree without telling the hunter, who fired at the big tree, causing the fire.

Clinton's fault. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That son of a bitch!!!
Clinton will not get away with this one.

But I bet the liberal media doesn't even report it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Uhh, that was not a tree...
That Clinton was next to. That was his Penis of Evil. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. crap on hannity
but no offense...crap on anyone who tries to make this political.

this year it was a hunter. last year it was a hiker. what the fuck does it matter?

people are dying and losing everything they own and anyone who wants to make this a political "point" today is souless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The year before the sharks caused the fires
When they weren't searching for Chandra Leavy that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewGuy Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think it is because the issue is not how the fires were started
Some fires are started each year. Some by lightning, some by arsonists and some by idiots. The issue of clearing trees, underbrush and deadfalls is not related to who starts a fire but to how far and how fast it will spread once lit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. i agree and btw...welcome to DU
there are political aspects to this because of the sensitivies on both sides as to how we manage forests. but shame on anyone that tries to make this a 'gotcha' out of it...on either side.

at least while the fires are still burning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC