Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Further Explanation of Clark's comments on Bush's responsibility for 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
StephNW4Clark Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:03 PM
Original message
Further Explanation of Clark's comments on Bush's responsibility for 9/11
MARGARET WARNER: Let me ask you about something you said Tuesday on another foreign policy issue in the speech. You said there's no way this administration can walk away from its responsibility for 9/11. What are you saying there? Are you saying the president could have prevented the September 11 attacks and somehow failed in his responsibility to do so?

WESLEY CLARK: What I'm saying is the president is the commander in chief. He's the highest authority in the United States of America. When something goes wrong, he has an obligation to lead and participate actively in the investigation of what went wrong, not to stonewall it. He needs to provide that information in the presidential commission.

One more thing, Margaret: When you look at this, every military commander in the aftermath of a military operation, whether it's a success or failure, we all do what we call after-action reviews. And the commander participates in it. He's not exempt. He doesn't say, well, my intelligence officer didn't do this. He actually lays it out. They say, what happened exactly? And why did it happen? And everybody fesses up.

Now we don't know exactly what happened in this administration but what we do know is that the threat of Osama bin Laden was well known and recognized on the 21st of January in 2001. What we also know is that in September on the 10th of September, there was still no plan for dealing with Osama bin Laden.We don't really know what happened. We don't know whether that was normal, whether it was abnormal but here is what I think the American people need to know.

I think they need to know that the President of the United States believes that the buck stops on his desk, not on the desk of FBI official in Arizona or somebody in Minnesota who didn't communicate a memo and so forth and that everything was okay because no one told him.

When you're the commander in chief, it's your obligation to know, to set the command climate as we would say in the military -- the intensity of your effort. You do your homework. You work the issues. Your highest obligation as the President of the United States next to upholding the Constitution is to assure the security of the United States of America.


http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec03/clark_10-30.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Delicious
Of course it should be common knowledge 9-11 could have been prevented. So many clues were just obviously there. Turn up the heat, Clark, and you'll win my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Every other candidate needs to be doing the same thing that Clark
is doing about 9-11. We should never let a day go by without some Dem slamming bush* for blocking the 9-11 investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Amen
I'm a bit concerned that there's a potential for backfire. I've become ultra-cautious these days. But hopefully this will catch on. There's no reason for Bush to block an investigation unless there's something really embarrassing or damning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. ASSAULTO!
Attack! Attack!

"Never get out of the boat, unless you're going all the way."

CAPT Willard, Apocalypse Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Way to go Wes !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. While this is what needs to be said
I don't think any of the other candidates will follow suit, this is a very touchy subject that the repugs want buried and just like the war itself will be labled as unpatriotic to further blame "flightsuit" when most Americans now think it was the FBI and CIA that didn't do enough.

The 9/11 investigation is going no where, bush's stonewalling will be made to look as if he doesn't want to lay any more blame on the intelligence whith a promise to not let it happen again and that it is an internal problem.

Nice job General, but your on a very slippery slope right now.



Retyred In Fla

So I Read This Book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Perhaps...
...but maybe the General is actually hoping to goad the Administration into challenging his patriotism.

Having the president (or his puppetmasters) respond directly to a candidate who hasn't even won his party's nomination yet would be a strategic coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually, the slippery Slope is where Wes is most at home....
His question to Bush today: Will you be playing dress up again and wearing your little flight suit for Halloween?

read his actual words:

Happy Halloween! I hope you are enjoying yourself on this lighthearted
holiday.

But even as we celebrate, I can't help but recall a recent example of "dressing up" that still galls me. When George W. Bush had the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln -- an aircraft carrier with a full crew onboard -- waste time and money turning circles off of San Diego so he could put a flight suit on for a "photo op," I realized just how far off track this administration has taken us. - Wes Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. It takes a brave soul to be on that slippery slope....
and I respect Clark for his statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. No one respects Clark more
than I do for standing up and saying what needs to be said.

I just don't want him to be hung out to dry by the other candidates on this issue for fear of looking to politicise 9/11 ultimately being the fault of bush with partisan politics and the fear of being labled unpatriotic for pointing the finger yet again at bush.

Clark's statement is right on, but if he's the only one of the candidates saying it, then bush gets yet another pass and Clark gets painted as desperate to win at any cost by dredging up what most Americans see as a dead horse.

This needs to be shouted from the rooftops by all the candidates at every opportunity so people wake up and see that bush is stonewalling the investigation and America needs to demand why. And it needs to be shouted not just by the new guy on the block.


Retyred In Fla

So I Read This Book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oustanding!!!
Clark gets better as he goes- I am rally starting to hope he is on the ticket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. I like the fact that we have great candidates representing us
I hope we can have everyone of them in power in some capacity.

(Why not have ten presidents?!**)

They all have strengths. I think we need them all speaking out and telling the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clark just moved up on my list of candidate preferences.
Where are the other candidates on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is why I supported Clark
Edited on Fri Oct-31-03 04:46 PM by Brian Sweat
I knew he would take it to Bush in a way that no one else could get away with. I think that this is just a taste of things to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yep, and that's why
they are scared to death of him. Go, Wes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. awesome. Go Clark!
saying what needs to be said. Thank God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clark is starting a slow burn
and when it sparks Bush is going to get burned. Hmm, that was a rather clumsy turn of phrase, but still, go Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC