redwitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 06:58 PM
Original message |
|
Just rented Kill Bill 2, without having watched Kill Bill 1. Is this wrong? Should I watch them in order? Help!
|
Politicub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Look inside yourself grasshopper |
|
you already know the answer to this question
|
redwitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Zen advice is difficult for me at this time.
|
Sannum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Watch them in order together in one evening!!! Don't make me come down there!!!
|
redwitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
My head is going to explode!!!!!!
|
theorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. There's a recap of volume 1 at the beginning of volume 2. |
|
It's not a problem. They're actually very different films in many ways.
|
Pastor of Deaniacs
(44 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
it wouldn't really matter. You will miss a few of the "jokes" in 2 w/o knowing the backstory.
-The Crazy 88 -The mysticism of the Hatori Hanzo sword -The identity of the piano man (ie Old colored fellah).
|
theorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. And redwitch doesn't seem all that interested in catching everything. |
|
They're both very entertaining films on there own.
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. 2 was MUCH better than 1 |
|
In fact, I wished I'd just seen two.
|
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I thought part 2 was better than part 1 also. |
|
I would recommend seeing them in order. The second one will make a lot more sense after seeing the first.
|
Dukakis88
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
22. Me 3. Part 1 had no character development. Part 2 was an improvement. |
|
Loved the stuff with Michael Madsen working in the strip club, getting reamed out by his boss.
|
Jean Louise Finch
(651 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I really liked 1, but 2 bored me to tears. 1 is way quirkier and, I thought, more interesting. 2 is a little sentimental -- though it's got some wicked scenes.
|
Worst Username Ever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. you REALLY need to watch the first one first. n/t |
NewHampshireDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Though you could watch them out of order, you'll really enjoy the first one much more without the little spoilers in the second.
|
Kokonoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I could watch it backward or forward |
Placebo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Always watch films that are released in chronological order, IN THE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER THAT THEY WERE RELEASED!
It's for your benefit really. :pals:
|
jukes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
AlFrankenFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
15. watch in order definitely or it will make little sense to you n/t |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I watched 2 before I watched 1 |
|
After a day or two, you won't notice the difference.
|
KenCarson
(170 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message |
17. i suggest just watching random chapters if you're going to mix it up |
northzax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. eh, it's not really going to mess with the story, is it? |
|
just a bunch of vignettes linked together.
|
Tweed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Don't bother with either |
|
Tarantino has got to be the most overrated person in Hollywood.
|
laheina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
The movies were OK, but one has to wonder what the sexual brutality says about him. 90% of it wasn't even related to the plot.
|
Tweed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Glad to see someone agrees |
|
Everyone else here is praising him. His movies are too violent. I also think that Pulp Fiction is a great picture until he pops up. He is a terrible director. A good director would have been able to tell that he was going to suck the movie down.
|
bliss_eternal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-04 02:16 AM
Response to Original message |
24. I liked part one sooooo much more than part two.... |
|
....too much talking, not enough action for me. I'm usually not big on violence at all. But after the pace is set in one for all that non-stop action, it was hard for me to handle all the talking in two.
Me watching pt. 2 : Yawn. When is someone going to kick some ass?
LOL!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 16th 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |