Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the guy that plead guilty to child porn (BSA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:06 PM
Original message
So the guy that plead guilty to child porn (BSA)
is claiming that he was able to keep his addiction separate from his work.*

Yeah.




*yes, I was just watching CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. you mean the Boy Scout guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes. BSA = Boy Scouts of America
His lawyer was just on CNN, talking about how the guy only had the porn on his home computer, and how his client was able to keep his addiction separate from his work. Someone else went on to talk about his upstanding life. Blah blah blah.

It just struck me as a funny comment. Fox in the hen house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yet they got in a fit about gay scout leaders
as if they can't keep they private sex lives seperate from their scout duties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Stunning hypocrisy, once again.
Which is probably why I was stuck in a fit of laughter.

Sigh. I wish the BSA wasn't such a fucked up organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dammit!
I thought this was a Pete Townshend thread. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I thought he was doing "research" wouldn't that make it impossible
to keep them separate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minerva50 Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. He was a leader of the jihad against homosexuals in the Boy Scouts.
According to "Raw Story." The Boy Scouts are such asses. They don't allow either atheists or gays to taint their purity. They claim to be a "private" organization and hence allowed to discriminate; but they are really running a "public" service organization that should be open to all boys.
I regularly contribute to the girl scouts, they do not discriminate. As a matter of fact, most people knew a few of our camp counselors were gay, but they were well respected and great leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. And this is an absurd statement why?
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 03:45 PM by patcox2
There are an awful lot of people obsessed with adult heterosexual porn, for example, who not only aren't predatory rapists, to the contrary, they rarely have sex, willing or otherwise, at least with someone else. Which would mean that they are able to use porn for their sexual arousal without engaging in gangbangs at the office.

I think its kinda common for people with paraphilias to rigidly compartmentalize their lives. Thats why its always such a shock, when you hear about the straightlaced banker guys who once a week pay a dominatrix to bind and gag them, walk them around on all fours with a dog leash and then pee on them. Yet they rarely do it at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, child pornography is illegal, but even if that weren't the case
I think there's a real issue with this guy's claim that he could enjoy child porn and still not molest children, when he was leading the charge against gays in the BSA. That's hypocritical to me.

I know plenty of gay men and none of them are interested in child porn, nor are they pedophiles. They're sexually interested in other men, not children. I'd leave my two sons (ages 7 and 5) with my gay friend without thinking twice about it. I'd never let them get near anyone who is into child porn, regardless of whether he (or she) claimed they only viewed it at home alone.

But anyway, even if you can enjoy child porn without acting on it as a pedophile, the real audacity here is that this guy was actively opposed to gays in the BSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Oh, I agree on the hypocracy and audacity all right.
You know, Jung wrote some stuff on the subject of hypocracy that really makes sense. The fact is we should never be shocked or surprised at hypocracy, its a basic component of human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. True.
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?

The Shadow knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC