seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:22 PM
Original message |
|
The movie with Nicole Kidman? It was stupid and the kid was creepy.
She had a nice haircut though.
|
Shine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No, but I've GIVEN Birth. |
|
:evilgrin:
does that count?
|
seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Me too. I think the movie was worse though. |
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I saw a Caesarean section once. |
|
It was pretty neat. Well, messy, but a cool thing to see.
|
seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Plus their heads are not as pointy, right? |
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. This was a 9lb breach baby boy |
|
He looked very good. It was a planned C-section but amazing how quickly they took the baby out- just a couple of minutes. Appeared to be much easier on the baby. It would have been very difficult in his position to have a natural delivery.
|
Dude_CalmDown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No but if the haircut was that amazing long curly reddish hair she... |
|
...has in some of her movies then I'm gonna watch it tonight. Nothing turns a beauty into a goddess like long curly red hair.
|
seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. No it was all cut off like a boy's cut - sorry. But it did look |
|
great on her. Bad, bad movie. Kept thinking it would improve but it never did.
|
Dude_CalmDown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Thanks for the warning then. |
|
That movie could have singlehandedly ruined 93% of my dreams.
|
bliss_eternal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Interesting you bring this up-- |
|
as I was tossing around the idea of asking about it here in the lounge. You saved me the effort.
The ads for it creeped me out so much. I don't get why anyone made a film with such a premise--it seemed so gross...
Was it as bad as I thought it would be?
|
seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. It was freaking boring. Now a lot of reviewers on IMDB think it |
|
is a great film - they particularly appreciate the 2 entire minutes when the camera is on Nicole Kidman's face - something about the range of emotion and becoming one with the character.
Perhaps I'm too superficial but I really care about the story and this story really didn't hold my interest.
You might feel differently.
|
bliss_eternal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I doubt I would feel any differently than you did... |
|
the premise gave me the creeps. Her husband comes back, reincarnated as a little boy, and he's still in love with her? Eeeeeuuuwww! Just seem like a sensational way for the film makers to try to make a buck. I have no interest in seeing it at all...
I do appreciate your review. I was sincerely interested if the film had ANY redeeming value. Sounds like it didn't.
Who knows what motivates critics these days? LOL!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |