LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:32 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Why aren't the Beatles at the end of AT&T commercials? |
|
As you know, the Oasis song "All Around The World" is at the end of AT&T commercials that are out now. Why do you think the Beatles were not selected?
|
Shell Beau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Hmmm, well the word sell out comes to mind! |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 12:34 PM by Shell Beau
:shrug: And the fact that wacko jacko owns the rights to most of the songs!
|
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes, the Beatles don't own their songs |
|
Michael Jackson does, so perhaps it was he who wanted too much money for that.
|
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. but not for much longer |
|
I heard he's selling his 50% stake in them to stave of bankruptcy...
|
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Don't you know he's in a shitload of trouble if even the Beatles catalogue can't help him? :dilemma:
|
northzax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. not so much selling as being repossessed |
|
Sony has been loaning him money with the catalogue as collateral for a long time, he's believed to owe them as much as $200 million.
|
ohiosmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Because they are either dead, senile, or incontinent. |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 12:47 PM by ohiosmith
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-13-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |