Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 08:25 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Has the time come for compulsory use of a sarcasm smilie in every sarcastic Original Post? |
billyoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Sarcasm tags are for idiots. |
|
It perpetuates a lack of critical thinking.
|
dawgmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Hell no. If it comes to that, I'd have to just put it in my signature line. n/t |
Oeditpus Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. That might not be a bad idea |
dawgmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
leeroysphitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. These are the days of blackboards and fingernails. n/t |
petronius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-03-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message |
6. People who are good at sarcasm shouldn't need sarcasm smilies |
|
People who are bad at sarcasm shouldn't use sarcasm. People who are bad at reading good sarcasm wouldn't notice the smilie, anyway. For all these reasons, the sarcasm smilie should not be used...
|
Fire Walk With Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-03-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I'm too tired of explaining things anymore. Let whomever reads what I post, take what they want from it, even if it's utterly incorrect. I'm so used to things around me being taken horribly out of context, to not even care anymore.
|
Jamastiene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-03-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Can you part with the pig? n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |