DJcairo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:17 PM
Original message |
Paula Zahn: Do the Dems have only one hope for '04? shows Gore on CNN now |
Prodemsouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. As much as I like Gore, I think some people are trying to create |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 07:25 PM by Prodemsouth
confusion. They are trying to distract from Clark Fever because they know if he gets in it does not look good for monkey boy.. Another poster at another site made the point that the right likes to talk about Hillary and Al running because it increases campaign contributions to their side.
edit; add words to clarify meaning.
|
cosmicdot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. they don't need help increasing campaign contributions |
|
from what we've been noticing ... the money is pouring in already ...
|
democrat in Tallahassee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. f(*ck paula zahn. looks to me like we got several good shots at |
|
knocking bush out. all they got is a liar in the white house who is sending us to the poor house.
|
madaboutharry
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I think you came up with a great campaign slogan! "All they got is a liar in the White House who is sending us to the poor house."
|
bread_and_roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. great slogan materiel! |
|
"a liar in the white house who is sending us to the poor house"
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Question! Do the zahns, blitzers, russerts, schieffers, steffenoupo- |
|
uluos', brokaws, ect,ect, ad infintum go down with bush?
And I mean when he gets canned ...what do they do? Suck it up?
|
Prodemsouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I would like to see that. |
|
n/t I think they all should be fired like him they have been very lazy. Woodward too, add him to that lot
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yes indeed...woodward...he was in that "ad infinitum" bunch. |
|
:-) and any of those pandering sychophants.
|
MuseRider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. Remember how they smirked |
|
during and after the 2002 elections? It will be more than fun to watch them the day after the election, more than fun. Squirm they will because they will have to cover it before inauguration without too many bad things to say.
|
Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I hate this spin...why don't they ask the question "How much further |
|
can Bush plummet in the polls????"
You think the guy had a 90% approval rating!!
|
chaumont58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Paula Zhan ain't got a clue |
|
She probably thinks its 1904 and the Dems are up against TR. "Cross you legs more often, honey. It will improve your ratings."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message |