Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if no candidate has a majority of delegates after the primaries?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
zorkpolitics Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 08:40 PM
Original message
What if no candidate has a majority of delegates after the primaries?
What if Dean, Kerry, Lieberman, Graham, and Edwards all win early primaries and all continue to the convention? What if no candidate has a majority of delegates?

Would a multiple ballot convention be a good thing:
Great TV coverage, thrill of the race, dramatic winner, a final united party?

Or would a deadlocked convention be a disaster:
Endless ballots, no winner for days, lack of legitimacy to whoever wins, bad feelings and lack of unity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. it would be a victoy ofr democracy
it would take the wind out of the DLC and the controling special interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madball02 Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. what?
the no plurality amongst delegates would help the DLC?


I think thats reaching...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Perhaps I need to explian better
It is my belife that the activist population that typicly goes to the convention is to the left of the DLC. Sorry if I was not clear.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unlikely in the Front-Loaded System
It's fun to think about, but the system is "rigged" to quickly arrive at a winner. Lots of primaries clustered together early in the calendar. However, something like 15% of delegates are actually unelected by voters, since they are "superdelegates," such as Congressmen. I think Dukakis in 1988 needed some of their votes to win on the first ballot. That's another safeguard against a deadlocked convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeniB Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Aren't you forgetting someone?
Edited on Mon Jul-28-03 03:16 PM by JeniB
For all of the support he has, I can't believe you guys keep trying to keep him out.

Edited for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm Thinking American Idol
It's the only truly democratic way. Best singer wins.

Ooh, what an awful thought...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Kim Locke for President!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. A Truly Awful Thought
American Idol probably not a good idea: Isn't Trent Lott a fairly decent singer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Several months ago...
Hillary Clinton predicted that the Democratic nominee would be decided by March.

And doesn't Gephardt have the most superdelegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Gephardt currently leads the delegate count
http://www.freewebs.com/goobergunch/pdem.html

(and yes, I am shamelessly plugging my own site)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. There's always Al Gore
He pretty much agreeable to everyone - since he's the legitimate President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. not to me....
And not to many Independent, moderate voters who don't want a melodramatic "rematch" of Bush vs. Gore.

And if we're so keen on putting up a "compromise candidate" in the event of a deadlocked convention, then how about Wesley Clark? He has much less baggage than Gore does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devarsi Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Why Melodrama?
Why not simply "dramatic?" There's nothing wrong with some drama in politics, it may actually GOTV!

And BTW, EVERYBODY has baggage! (Oh Yeah, Clark has baggage)

But of all the candidates, ONLY Gore has already beaten Bush.
Only Gore has national, executive level experience.
Only Gore has been cheated of the Presidency.
Only electing Gore would restore the blance of democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. yeah, that makes a lot of sense...
Just shove Gore down the throats of new voters in 2004, even if they weren't eligible to vote in 2000.

No thank you - - I'll take a fair, unhijacked primary process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. And there's always Wesley Clark
See my above post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would enjoy watching it...
so I think it would be a good thing.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. It would be cool but
I think in that case the 800 super-delegates would get together and throw themselves at one guy or the other and that would annoint him before the convention started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If one candidate soes not get to the 37 percent or so level
Then you have it, the delegates, the DNC, and the DLC select the candidate they think most likely to be able to mount the best opposition to the Republican incumbent.

Since 37 percent of the delegates are DLC loyal super delegates, they are the power that makes the choice. Once the canapgn gets seriously going, whoever is given the nod by most of that 37 percent wins.

The DLC is seriously opposed to Dean and unless he starts serious fence mending, he does not stand a chance. Regardless of what the voters think. If you look at the polls, only two candidates have enough puplic support to carry the nomination, and so far thats Gephardt and Lieberman. The number of undecided voters have falle to too small a percentage in the national polls to allow any other candidates to get enough of the votes to carry the party's nomination, except for Kerry, who comes close to getting enough votes, Dean falls just a bit too far behing to reach the threshold, and since all that is really left to run is to pick up support now is between labor day and new years. It is late in the game to move high enough for any but Gephardt or Lieberman to carry the support of the party itself. The primaries are not much different than polls, and guides the party, but do not rule the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Hillary or Gore
If the DLC were truly going to decide this, they'd pick the two people who consistently poll the best: Hillary or Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shatoga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Draft GORE and WIN - more votes than Bush - again!
All we'd need is an honest vote count to elect President Al Gore.

given an honest vote count in 2000;
Gore would be president right now.

Just imagine.
No dismantling of environmental regulations.

No invasion of other countries on a basis of lies.

No stand down on 911.

America lost when we failed to go on a general strike in 2000 and Demand an honest vote count.

The fantasy that Bush will let the votes be counted in 04 is for those who buy swampland in Florida.

Or believe Saddam had WMD and just didn't use them to defend his country from invasion.

Ask the easter bunny, or great pumpkin for an honest vote count in 04, because Bush won't give you one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Then Dennis Kucinich would WIN!!
Watch as the Green Party throws their support to him. They are not above changing partys just to vote for him. Word is it is being discussed right now in the California pleninaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. As I see it, if no candidate has the majority...
there will be deals for candidates to drop out of the contest, and "recommend" to their delegates pledged to them by the primary to vote in a particular direction.

I think some deals for VP, or Sec'y of State, etc. might be made during that time. It would be great fun to watch. Tension, vote-swapping, back-stabbing: a real convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC