Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State Pensions’ $865 Billion Loss Affects New Hires

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 10:03 AM
Original message
State Pensions’ $865 Billion Loss Affects New Hires
Jan. 13 (Bloomberg) -- State governments from Rhode Island to California have run up estimated pension-fund losses of $865.1 billion, forcing some to cut benefits for new hires.

Assets for 109 state funds declined 37 percent to $1.46 trillion over the 14 months ended Dec. 16, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of stocks fell 41 percent in the period.

“Not a whole lot of people get too excited about pension funds,” Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter said in an interview. “But if you have to pay those costs, they do grab your attention.”

..........

The $865 billion in losses, which exceed the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program that Congress approved in October, comes as states face budget deficits totaling $42 billion.

..........

To return to 2007 actuarial funding levels by 2010, the 109 funds would need annual returns of 52 percent on assets, the analysis found. Annual returns of 18 percent would achieve the goal by 2013, the center said. The projections are based on a 5.7 percent annual increase in liabilities and a $50 billion increase in assets from contributions above annual payouts.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aV0VZMxdImVQ&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is why I'm scared of buying back some of my state retirement time.
"To return to 2007 actuarial funding levels by 2010, the 109 funds would need annual returns of 52 percent on assets,"

:rofl: :cry:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. There's a big scandal coming about this.

Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Banning the sale of states’ and localities’ debt through privately negotiated deals is the only way to combat corruption in the $2.7 trillion market, according to Christopher Taylor, who ran the municipal bond industry’s self-regulatory organization for almost three decades.

“If they want to sell bonds at tax-exempt rates, it should be mandated that they do so at auction,” Taylor, 62, executive director of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board from 1978 to 2007, said in an interview from his home in Alexandria, Virginia.

Taylor, who has also criticized banks’ employment of consultants to attract business and the use of interest-rate swaps by municipalities, first aired his plan to bar negotiated bond sales at a Princeton University conference in November. He repeated the proposal in the interview. He left the MSRB in the summer of 2007 after the board declined in 2006 to renew his contract.

Shifting to competitive sales from negotiation, in which states and cities choose which underwriters will sell bonds to investors before they are priced, would change the way about 50,000 issuers borrow. Of $391.5 billion in municipal bonds sold in 2008, $334 billion, or more than 85 percent, were marketed via negotiations with underwriters, according to Thomson Reuters data. An average of 79 percent of municipal bonds, by value, were sold in this fashion over the past decade.

The 2005 conviction and 10-year prison sentence given to Philadelphia Treasurer Corey Kemp for trading city financial business for bribes and political contributions made Taylor change his mind about negotiated sales, he said. Such deals rose from 54 percent of municipal bond sales at the beginning of his MSRB tenure in 1978 to 82 percent by the time he left office.

‘Money Chase’

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aN2QZloLKHbY&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC