(edited) Statistical & Scientific groups must step up with solid analysis

[henslee]

of voter fraud. Only they have the pedigree. Not us. Their statements would be weightier and more embraceable by the press than ours.

I know Scientists and Engineers for Change came out strongly against Bush. Here is their website. http://scientistsandengineersforchange.org/index.php


True they are partial but there must be all sorts of other engineering/math organizations, academic and non academic that can look at the fraud scenario and give us some pedigree feedback.

Starting a list of them right here with would be a good idea. And then people can email them. I suspect of encouragement from the public asking that they undertake a serious analysis of the voter fraud anomalies might go a long way.

[shelley806]

1. Have you read the links on statistical analysis here? There are some very

good ones, but the problem now has become like the proverbial needle in a haystack with all the current threads, theories, etc. I'll try to find and post the few that I've found most convincing.

[henslee]

2. Good. Try and find ones with resumes attached. Those are the only ones

that have a shot at breaking through the media filter. Remember, big media blamed has already and unfairly blamed bloggers for supposedly distorted exit polls. We need Phd's, MIT, JPL, associations, federations, etc. We need the nerds and the eggheads!