Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about Feingold/Edwards for 08?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:25 PM
Original message
How about Feingold/Edwards for 08?
Either way, Feingold/Edwards or Edwards/Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope you're joking.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope, dead serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Feingold yes, Edwards no.
What has Edwards done? He's had one undistinguished term in the Senate. I think we can find a better running mate for Russ than that. Somebody with national defense credentials would be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think Edwards can fill the gaps with
his intelligence. He can learn between now and then. Plus, I think he embodies the Democratic philosophy as does Feingold.
Both would be strong on people's rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, but you want diversity on a ticket
Wes Clark would make a fine running mate for Feingold. Call me superstitious, but I don't see much point in running last year's losers in the next election. They had a golden opportunity and failed to capitalize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I agree - Feingold/Clark would be a nice ticket.
I agree, I wouldn't mind seeing Feingold/Clark - but I don't think we should run Edwards again. Don't get me wrong, I liked him as a candidate, but I think he is still a little green when it comes to politics. Hey, let him run in the primaries and we'll see who has the best message. The more, the merrier.

I thought Edwards wouldn't run again because of his wife's situation? I don't think that limited foreign policy should be a deterrent though, let's not forget - George Bush had zero foreign policy experience when he was (s)elected (unless you count flying a flight simulator down in Texas before going AWOL).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I like Edwards/Feingold
Edwards has only said that he will wait until his wife is better before deciding whether or not to run. It isn't that he has already announced that he won't run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Feingold Yes
No Edwards. We need some fresh blood. Maybe a red state Governor or Wes Clark. No more 2 senator tickets. I think all that Washington turns some people off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveConn Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Agreed a Feingold/Clark ticket could be good.
It would be better if Clark won Governor of Arkansas in 06 though. =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Whatever. Just so long as goddamned Hillary
stays as far away from this theater as possible. Clark/Edwards, Kerry/Edwards, Edwards/Warner, Kerry/Feingold . . . any one of those.

SO sick of this "Hillary '08: Just ACCEPT It, You Stupid Bluetards" bullshit. These people must not WANT to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. I like Feingold
but I hope that he would have the good sense to pick a better running mate than Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Lamb Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. question
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 01:13 AM by Senator Lamb
but has a losing VP candidate ever been chosen again for the same slot? FDR was a losing VP candidate but the next time he ran was for President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I have no idea.
I just know that I had to hold my nose to vote for a ticket with Edwards on it last time, and I'm not sure I could do it again. I just never "got" what it was that he added to the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm afraid that Feingold's religion will hurt him
Especially if he's at the top of the ticket. There are millions of people in this country -- especially in the Christianity-drenched south -- who just won't vote for a Jew under any circumstances. They may tell pollsters that they will, but when they get in the voting booth it's another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. I am s-o-o-o-o-o tired of talk about possible 2008 nominees . . .
if the voting system isn't fixed, we could run Jesus Christ in 2008 and we'll still lose . . . right now all this discussion is just a waste of time, energy, and bandwidth . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cire4 Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thank you...I'm glad someone said it
So much can change in the next four years that its unfathonable to discuss possible '08 tickets when we don't know the circumstances which we will be facing.

Focus on 2006, BBV, and preventing privatization of social security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC